These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27141164)
21. Correlation between sagittal condylar guidance angles obtained using radiographic and protrusive occlusal record methods. Kwon OK; Yang SW; Kim JH J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):302-307. PubMed ID: 28874998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative Evaluation of the Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Protrusive Interocclusal Records, OPG, and CBCT in Edentulous Patients: An Gheedle R; John P J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jun; 24(6):403-408. PubMed ID: 37534507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A clinical study of the variation in horizontal condylar guidance obtained by using three anterior points of reference and two different articulator systems. Prajapati P; Sethuraman R; Naveen YG; Patel J Contemp Clin Dent; 2013 Apr; 4(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 24015003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparative study to measure the condylar guidance by the radiographic and clinical methods. Shreshta P; Jain V; Bhalla A; Pruthi G J Adv Prosthodont; 2012 Aug; 4(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 22977723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Comparison of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from radiographic and clinical records in dentate patients]. Ñahuincopa-Ríos RJ; Ñahuincopa-López PM; Ángeles-López RG Rev Cient Odontol (Lima); 2021; 9(2):e060. PubMed ID: 38465274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Age changes in horizontal condylar angle: a clinical and cephalometric study. Sreelal T; Janardanan K; Nair AS; Nair AS J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Jun; 13(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 24431719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of a novel rotation coordinating device on registered horizontal condylar guidance of nonarcon semi-adjustable articulators. Manshaee F; Najatidanesh F; Savabi O; Atash R Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():101. PubMed ID: 38020259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of accuracy between extraoral Gothic arch tracing and various other methods assessing horizontal condylar guidance angle in completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Potdukhe SS; Iyer JM; Nadgere JB J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(4):322-334. PubMed ID: 37861609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparative study to correlate between clinically and radiographically determined sagittal condylar guidance in participants with different skeletal relationships. Singh S; Das S; Bhattacharyya J; Ghosh S; Goel P; Dutta K J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2017; 17(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 28584419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Effect of interocclusal records on the condylar path of the articulator]. Angyal J; Bukovinszki K; Keszthelyi G Fogorv Sz; 2002 Apr; 95(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 11980427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Condylar guidance: correlation between articular morphology and panoramic radiographic images in dry human skulls. Gilboa I; Cardash HS; Kaffe I; Gross MD J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):477-82. PubMed ID: 18514670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of Sagittal Inclination of Occlusal Plane and Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Various Anterior Reference Points on Arcon and Nonarcon Articulators. Palaskar JN; Joshi NP; Hindocha AD; Gunjal AP; Balsaraf KD Contemp Clin Dent; 2022; 13(3):255-260. PubMed ID: 36213845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparative study on the influence of third point of reference on condylar guidance settings in a semi-adjustable articulator with lateral cephalographs: An in-vivo study. Aldhuwayhi S; Mustafa MZ; Shaikh SA; Mehta S; Mathar MI; Thakare AA; Varadharaju VK; Ayub MS; Shamsudeen SM; A Khan AR Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Oct; 24(10):1457-1462. PubMed ID: 34657010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study. dos Santos J; Nelson S; Nowlin T J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of protrusive interocclusal records to pantographic tracings. Curtis DA J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Aug; 62(2):154-6. PubMed ID: 2668509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative clinical investigation of horizontal condylar inclination using the JMA electronic recording system and a protrusive wax record for setting articulators. Ratzmann A; Mundt T; Schwahn C; Langforth G; Hutzen D; Gedrange T; Kordass B Int J Comput Dent; 2007 Jul; 10(3):265-84. PubMed ID: 18271499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sagittal condylar guidance as determined by protrusion records and wear facets of teeth. Donegan SJ; Christensen LV Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(5):469-72. PubMed ID: 1811642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparative evaluation of static and functional methods for recording centric relation and condylar guidance: a clinical study. Thakur M; Jain V; Parkash H; Kumar P J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2012 Sep; 12(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 23997468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Recording sagittal condylar angles using a mandibular facebow. Johnson A; Winstanley RB J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 24(12):904-8. PubMed ID: 9467992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]