These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27141164)
41. Comparative evaluation of condylar inclination in dentulous subjects as determined by two radiographic methods: Orthopantomograph and cone-beam computed tomography - An Mawani D; Muddugangadhar BC; Das A; Mukhopadhyay A J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 31040544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The Effect of Average Value Mounting and Facebow Transfer on Condylar Guidance Settings in a Semi-Adjustable Articulator - A Comparative Study using Digital Lateral Cephalographs in Edentulous Patients. Mustafa MZ; Shetty G; Deeban Y; Mathar MI; Joseph AM; Aldhuwayhi S; Thakare AA; Al-Hamad KA; Shamsudeen SM; Ayub MS Niger J Clin Pract; 2024 Sep; 27(9):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 39348323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The importance of the Hanau formula in construction of complete dentures. Javid NS; Porter MR J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Oct; 34(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 1100807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A Comparative Evaluation of Lateral Condylar Guidance by Clinical and Radiographic Methods - Hanau's Formula Revisited. Praveena K; Ajay R; Devaki V; Balu K; Preethisuganya S; Menaga V J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S537-S541. PubMed ID: 34447149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of the reproducibility of panoramic radiographs between dentulous and edentulous patients. Park JW; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Jun; 44(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 24944958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An Kaur S; Datta K J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 29430140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A clinical comparison of sagittal condylar inclination and Bennett angle derived from a conventional electronic tracking device and an optical jaw tracking device. Nigam AA; Lee JD; Lee SJ J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38030543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluation of accuracy of transfer of the maxillary occlusal cant of two articulators using two facebow/semi-adjustable articulator systems: An in vivo study. Shetty S; Shenoy KK; Sabu A J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 27621543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of Hanau's formula in determination of lateral condylar guidance: A clinical research study. Bhawsar SV; Marathe AS; Ansari SA J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2015; 15(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 26929535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Analysis of sagittal condylar path inclination in consideration of Fischer's angle. Matsumura H; Tsukiyama Y; Koyano K J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 33(7):514-9. PubMed ID: 16774510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Reproducibility of wax interocclusal records on different articulators. Boulos PJ Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(6):755-759. PubMed ID: 30589004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reproducibility of lateral excursive tooth contact in a semi-adjustable articulator depending on the type of lateral guidance. Caro AJ; Peraire M; Martinez-Gomis J; Anglada JM; Samsó J J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Mar; 32(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 15707427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Association of Gonial Angle on Panoramic Radiograph with the Facial Divergence on Lateral Cephalogram. Abdul Rehman S; Rizwan S; Shah Faisal S; Sheeraz Hussain S J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2020 Apr; 30(4):355-358. PubMed ID: 32513351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparative evaluation of sagittal inclination of the occlusal plane with Frankfort horizontal plane in facebow transfers to semiadjustable and fully adjustable articulators. Palaskar JN; Joshi N; Gullapalli P; Shah P J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 31227235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant. Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of the accuracy of a fully digital method of measuring sagittal condylar inclination. Zhou Z; Wang S; Yuan Q; Yue L; Yang S Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 42(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 38475953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Digital Radiographic Study of Gonial angle in Forensic Odontology in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. Srii R; Koju S; Mahanta SK; Marla V; Niroula D; Upadhyaya C; Murthy PS JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2021 Apr; 59(236):350-355. PubMed ID: 34508539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]