These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27141166)

  • 1. An in vitro comparative study to evaluate the retention of different attachment systems used in implant-retained overdentures.
    Shastry T; Anupama NM; Shetty S; Nalinakshamma M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 27141166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retentive force variations of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Boulos PJ; Akiki LA; Makzoumé JE; Fakhoury J; Tohmé H; El Hage FS
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(4):41-45. PubMed ID: 29964247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
    Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Retention of Two Different Attachment Systems Used in Implant-Supported Overdentures.
    Dhamodaran S; Ahmed S; Nandini V; Marimuthu R; Ramadoss S
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S605-S610. PubMed ID: 36110775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
    Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention of mandibular implant-retained overdentures with two different attachment designs: An in vitro study.
    Ramadan RE; Mohamed FS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):738.e1-738.e6. PubMed ID: 32165012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retentive force and dislodgment time variations between three implant overdenture stud attachments in an acidic environment: An in-vitro pilot study.
    Farhat M; Daher T; Hajjar JJ; Boulos PJ
    Saudi Dent J; 2024 Feb; 36(2):368-373. PubMed ID: 38419987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
    Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of implant angulation and cyclic dislodging on the retentive force of two different overdenture attachments - an in vitro study.
    Srinivasan M; Schimmel M; Badoud I; Ammann P; Herrmann FR; Müller F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 26085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical Aspects of Various Attachments for Implant Overdentures: A Review.
    Mirchandani B; Zhou T; Heboyan A; Yodmongkol S; Buranawat B
    Polymers (Basel); 2021 Sep; 13(19):. PubMed ID: 34641063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How the initial retentive force of implant-supported overdentures can be affected with splinted and unsplinted attachments systems.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Savabi G; Razavi M
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2021; 18():101. PubMed ID: 35265284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of retentive force and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments combined with CAD-CAM milled bar.
    Chae SK; Cho WT; Choi JW; Bae EB; Bae JH; Bae GH; Huh JB
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 14(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 35284053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.