These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27141166)

  • 21. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
    Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Retention loss and wear assessment of three attachment systems for implant retained-mandibular overdentures: An in vitro study.
    Wakam R; Ramalingam S; Mawussi KB; Gorin C; Benoit A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106269. PubMed ID: 38043259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of changes in retentive force of three stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Kim SM; Choi JW; Jeon YC; Jeong CM; Yun MJ; Lee SH; Huh JB
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 7(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 26330977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of Distal Implant Inclination on Dislodging Forces of Different Locator Attachments Used for Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ashmawy TM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e666-e674. PubMed ID: 29143403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25.
    Reda KM; El-Torky IR; El-Gendy MN
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(4):380-385. PubMed ID: 27746603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Brushing effect on the retentive force of retentive inserts in three denture attachments: An in vitro study.
    Kamonkhantikul K; Homsiang W; Arksornnukit M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):487.e1-487.e12. PubMed ID: 35934574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Locator Versus Bar Attachment Effect on the Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdenture: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Dayekh MA; Khalifa AK
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e627-e636. PubMed ID: 28387994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study.
    Chen IC; Brudvik JS; Mancl LA; Rubenstein JE; Chitswe K; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 21821161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In Vitro Effects of Cyclic Dislodgement on Retentive Properties of Various Titanium-Based Dental Implant Overdentures Attachment System.
    Kang TY; Kim JH; Kim KM; Kwon JS
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Nov; 12(22):. PubMed ID: 31744164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro retention force changes during cyclic dislodging of three novel attachment systems for implant overdentures with different implant angulations.
    Maniewicz S; Badoud I; Herrmann FR; Chebib N; Ammann P; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Apr; 31(4):315-327. PubMed ID: 31876004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of different lubricants on the retentive force of LOCATOR(®) attachments - an in vitro pilot study.
    Srinivasan M; Schimmel M; Kobayashi M; Badoud I; Ammann P; Herrmann FR; Müller F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jul; 27(7):771-5. PubMed ID: 26354041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retentive force variations in three polyamide and a polyetheretherketone denture attachments for implant-supported overdentures: An in vitro study.
    Βei M; Kamalakidis SN; Pissiotis AL; Michalakis K; Naka O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37244792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1619-28. PubMed ID: 24278931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of interimplant distance and cyclic dislodgement on retention of LOCATOR and ball attachments: An in vitro study.
    Salehi R; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Hakimaneh SMR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Dec; 122(6):550-556. PubMed ID: 31027962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of three attachments in implant-tissue supported overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Tabatabaian F; Alaie F; Seyedan K
    J Dent (Tehran); 2010; 7(3):113-8. PubMed ID: 21998784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.