These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27141259)

  • 1. The selection criteria of temporary or permanent luting agents in implant-supported prostheses: in vitro study.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Brizuela-Velasco A; Ellacuria-Echebarria J
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 8(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 27141259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Pinés-Hueso J; deLlanos-Lanchares H; del Rio Highsmith J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention Strength after Compressive Cyclic Loading of Five Luting Agents Used in Implant-Supported Prostheses.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Brizuela-Velasco A; Pinés-Hueso J; Ellakuria-Echebarria J
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():2107027. PubMed ID: 27822468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of Implant Supported Metal Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Agents: A Comparative Invitro Study.
    Kapoor R; Singh K; Kaur S; Arora A
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Apr; 10(4):ZC61-4. PubMed ID: 27190954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Various Luting Cements on the Retention of Implant-Supported Metal Crowns.
    Mehta S; Kesari A; Tomar M; Sharma U; Sagar P; Nakum P; Rao K
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e41691. PubMed ID: 37575823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An
    Sarfaraz H; Hassan A; Shenoy KK; Shetty M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):166-172. PubMed ID: 31040551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A; Ercoli C; Graser G; Tallents R; Moss M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of CAD/CAM Crown Material and Cement Type on Retention to Implant Abutments.
    Lopes ACO; Machado CM; Bonjardim LR; Bergamo ETP; Ramalho IS; Witek L; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e552-e556. PubMed ID: 29961986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retentive strength of metal copings on prefabricated abutments with five different cements.
    Maeyama H; Sawase T; Jimbo R; Kamada K; Suketa N; Fukui J; Atsuta M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 16336914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of luting cement on the probabilities of survival and modes of failure of cast full-coverage crowns.
    Mitchell CA; Abbariki M; Orr JF
    Dent Mater; 2000 May; 16(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 10762680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Study on fatigue toughness of dental materials. 1. Compressive strength on various luting cements and composite resin cores].
    Miyamoto S; Takagawa T; Nozaki A; Yanaka N; Nakamura Y; Imai Y; Noguchi S; Hanamura N
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 33(4):966-76. PubMed ID: 2489748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.