These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27141765)

  • 1. Validation of the Sonographic Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules (SOFAR) Study in a Large Urban Trauma Center.
    Tollefson B; Nichols J; Fromang S; Summers RL
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 2016 Feb; 57(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 27141765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of bedside ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool for fractures in the ankle and foot.
    Atilla OD; Yesilaras M; Kilic TY; Tur FC; Reisoglu A; Sever M; Aksay E
    Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1058-61. PubMed ID: 25269589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The sonographic Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules study (the SOFAR study).
    Canagasabey MD; Callaghan MJ; Carley S
    Emerg Med J; 2011 Oct; 28(10):838-40. PubMed ID: 20943841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The accuracy of ultrasound evaluation in foot and ankle trauma.
    Ekinci S; Polat O; Günalp M; Demirkan A; Koca A
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Nov; 31(11):1551-5. PubMed ID: 23992775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurse practitioners treating ankle and foot injuries using the Ottawa Ankle Rules: a comparative study in the emergency department.
    Lau LH; Kerr D; Law I; Ritchie P
    Australas Emerg Nurs J; 2013 Aug; 16(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 23953094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility in the interpretation of Ottawa ankle and foot rules by specialized emergency nurses.
    Derksen RJ; Bakker FC; Geervliet PC; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Heilbron EA; Veenings B; Patka P; Haarman HJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 23(6):725-9. PubMed ID: 16182978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study.
    Crombach A; Azizi N; Lameijer H; El Moumni M; Ter Maaten JC
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2020 May; 13(1):19. PubMed ID: 32381048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in a Danish emergency department.
    Knudsen R; Vijdea R; Damborg F
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 May; 57(5):A4142. PubMed ID: 20441713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimising negative ankle and foot X-rays in the Emergency Department -- are the Ottawa ankle rules good enough?
    Crosswell S; Leaman A; Phung W
    Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2002-4. PubMed ID: 25257400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Usefulness of Ottawa rules for acute injuries of ankle and foot].
    Palapa García LR; Regla Márquez H
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2005; 43(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 16164846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children with ankle injuries.
    Plint AC; Bulloch B; Osmond MH; Stiell I; Dunlap H; Reed M; Tenenbein M; Klassen TP
    Acad Emerg Med; 1999 Oct; 6(10):1005-9. PubMed ID: 10530658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment.
    Pigman EC; Klug RK; Sanford S; Jolly BT
    Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jul; 24(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7912053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population.
    Gravel J; Hedrei P; Grimard G; Gouin S
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Oct; 54(4):534-540.e1. PubMed ID: 19647341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Efficiency of the Modified Ottawa ankle rules for the differential diagnosis of fracture in acute foot and ankle injury].
    Li N; Liu YS; Xin JY; Ma XL; Mei XL; Shi ZQ; Li G; Sun ZH
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Sep; 97(35):2742-2745. PubMed ID: 28954331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.
    Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Reardon M; Stewart JP; Maloney J
    JAMA; 1993 Mar; 269(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 8433468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of triage-based use of the Ottawa foot and ankle rules on the number of orders for radiographic imaging.
    Ashurst JV; Nappe T; Digiambattista S; Kambhampati A; Alam S; Ortiz M; Delpais P; Porter BG; Kurt A; Kane BG; Greenberg MR
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Dec; 114(12):890-7. PubMed ID: 25429079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound-assisted triage of ankle trauma can decrease the need for radiographic imaging.
    Hedelin H; Goksör LÅ; Karlsson J; Stjernström S
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1686-9. PubMed ID: 24157071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relevance of adjacent joint imaging in the evaluation of ankle fractures.
    Antoci V; Patel SP; Weaver MJ; Kwon JY
    Injury; 2016 Oct; 47(10):2366-2369. PubMed ID: 27465987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective comparison of the Low Risk Ankle Rules and the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a pediatric population.
    Ellenbogen AL; Rice AL; Vyas P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1262-1265. PubMed ID: 28363615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures.
    Leddy JJ; Smolinski RJ; Lawrence J; Snyder JL; Priore RL
    Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 9548106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.