292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27141765)
1. Validation of the Sonographic Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules (SOFAR) Study in a Large Urban Trauma Center.
Tollefson B; Nichols J; Fromang S; Summers RL
J Miss State Med Assoc; 2016 Feb; 57(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 27141765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The accuracy of bedside ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool for fractures in the ankle and foot.
Atilla OD; Yesilaras M; Kilic TY; Tur FC; Reisoglu A; Sever M; Aksay E
Acad Emerg Med; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1058-61. PubMed ID: 25269589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The sonographic Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules study (the SOFAR study).
Canagasabey MD; Callaghan MJ; Carley S
Emerg Med J; 2011 Oct; 28(10):838-40. PubMed ID: 20943841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of ultrasound evaluation in foot and ankle trauma.
Ekinci S; Polat O; Günalp M; Demirkan A; Koca A
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Nov; 31(11):1551-5. PubMed ID: 23992775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nurse practitioners treating ankle and foot injuries using the Ottawa Ankle Rules: a comparative study in the emergency department.
Lau LH; Kerr D; Law I; Ritchie P
Australas Emerg Nurs J; 2013 Aug; 16(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 23953094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility in the interpretation of Ottawa ankle and foot rules by specialized emergency nurses.
Derksen RJ; Bakker FC; Geervliet PC; de Lange-de Klerk ES; Heilbron EA; Veenings B; Patka P; Haarman HJ
Am J Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 23(6):725-9. PubMed ID: 16182978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Point-of-care bedside ultrasound examination for the exclusion of clinically significant ankle and fifth metatarsal bone fractures; a single blinded prospective diagnostic cohort study.
Crombach A; Azizi N; Lameijer H; El Moumni M; Ter Maaten JC
J Foot Ankle Res; 2020 May; 13(1):19. PubMed ID: 32381048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in a Danish emergency department.
Knudsen R; Vijdea R; Damborg F
Dan Med Bull; 2010 May; 57(5):A4142. PubMed ID: 20441713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimising negative ankle and foot X-rays in the Emergency Department -- are the Ottawa ankle rules good enough?
Crosswell S; Leaman A; Phung W
Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2002-4. PubMed ID: 25257400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Usefulness of Ottawa rules for acute injuries of ankle and foot].
Palapa García LR; Regla Márquez H
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2005; 43(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 16164846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children with ankle injuries.
Plint AC; Bulloch B; Osmond MH; Stiell I; Dunlap H; Reed M; Tenenbein M; Klassen TP
Acad Emerg Med; 1999 Oct; 6(10):1005-9. PubMed ID: 10530658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment.
Pigman EC; Klug RK; Sanford S; Jolly BT
Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jul; 24(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7912053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population.
Gravel J; Hedrei P; Grimard G; Gouin S
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Oct; 54(4):534-540.e1. PubMed ID: 19647341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Efficiency of the Modified Ottawa ankle rules for the differential diagnosis of fracture in acute foot and ankle injury].
Li N; Liu YS; Xin JY; Ma XL; Mei XL; Shi ZQ; Li G; Sun ZH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Sep; 97(35):2742-2745. PubMed ID: 28954331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.
Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Reardon M; Stewart JP; Maloney J
JAMA; 1993 Mar; 269(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 8433468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of triage-based use of the Ottawa foot and ankle rules on the number of orders for radiographic imaging.
Ashurst JV; Nappe T; Digiambattista S; Kambhampati A; Alam S; Ortiz M; Delpais P; Porter BG; Kurt A; Kane BG; Greenberg MR
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2014 Dec; 114(12):890-7. PubMed ID: 25429079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound-assisted triage of ankle trauma can decrease the need for radiographic imaging.
Hedelin H; Goksör LÅ; Karlsson J; Stjernström S
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1686-9. PubMed ID: 24157071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relevance of adjacent joint imaging in the evaluation of ankle fractures.
Antoci V; Patel SP; Weaver MJ; Kwon JY
Injury; 2016 Oct; 47(10):2366-2369. PubMed ID: 27465987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective comparison of the Low Risk Ankle Rules and the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a pediatric population.
Ellenbogen AL; Rice AL; Vyas P
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1262-1265. PubMed ID: 28363615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures.
Leddy JJ; Smolinski RJ; Lawrence J; Snyder JL; Priore RL
Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 9548106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
