107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27142243)
21. Assessment of fracture risk in proximal tibia with tumorous bone defects by a finite element method.
Lin Y; Ma L; Zhu Y; Lin Z; Yao Z; Zhang Y; Mao C
Microsc Res Tech; 2017 Sep; 80(9):975-984. PubMed ID: 28556495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prediction of vertebral strength under loading conditions occurring in activities of daily living using a computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method.
Matsumoto T; Ohnishi I; Bessho M; Imai K; Ohashi S; Nakamura K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(14):1464-9. PubMed ID: 19525837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predicting proximal femoral strength using structural engineering models.
Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Tehranzadeh J; Skinner HB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 Aug; (437):219-28. PubMed ID: 16056052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical analysis for stress fractures of the anterior middle third of the tibia in athletes: nonlinear analysis using a three-dimensional finite element method.
Sonoda N; Chosa E; Totoribe K; Tajima N
J Orthop Sci; 2003; 8(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 12898301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prediction of the strength and fracture location of the femoral neck by CT-based finite-element method: a preliminary study on patients with hip fracture.
Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Okazaki H; Sato W; Kominami H; Matsunaga S; Nakamura K
J Orthop Sci; 2004; 9(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 16228668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Burst fracture in the metastatically involved spine: development, validation, and parametric analysis of a three-dimensional poroelastic finite-element model.
Whyne CM; Hu SS; Lotz JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(7):652-60. PubMed ID: 12671351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prediction of torsional failure in 22 cadaver femora with and without simulated subtrochanteric metastatic defects: a CT scan-based finite element analysis.
Spruijt S; van der Linden JC; Dijkstra PD; Wiggers T; Oudkerk M; Snijders CJ; van Keulen F; Verhaar JA; Weinans H; Swierstra BA
Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):474-81. PubMed ID: 16819688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. High resolution quantitative computed tomography-based assessment of trabecular microstructure and strength estimates by finite-element analysis of the spine, but not DXA, reflects vertebral fracture status in men with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.
Graeff C; Marin F; Petto H; Kayser O; Reisinger A; Peña J; Zysset P; Glüer CC
Bone; 2013 Feb; 52(2):568-77. PubMed ID: 23149277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How accurately can we predict the fracture load of the proximal femur using finite element models?
van den Munckhof S; Zadpoor AA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Apr; 29(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 24485865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. QCT-based finite element prediction of pathologic fractures in proximal femora with metastatic lesions.
Benca E; Synek A; Amini M; Kainberger F; Hirtler L; Windhager R; Mayr W; Pahr DH
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10305. PubMed ID: 31311994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Modification to Mirels scoring system location component improves fracture prediction for metastatic disease of the proximal femur.
Amendola RL; Miller MA; Kaupp SM; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jan; 24(1):65. PubMed ID: 36694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Finite element analysis and computed tomography based structural rigidity analysis of rat tibia with simulated lytic defects.
Rennick JA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Kimbaris J; Tseng A; Masoudi A; Nayeb-Hashemi H; Vaziri A; Snyder BD
J Biomech; 2013 Oct; 46(15):2701-9. PubMed ID: 23972429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Structural consequences of endosteal metastatic lesions in long bones.
Hipp JA; McBroom RJ; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
J Orthop Res; 1989; 7(6):828-37. PubMed ID: 2795323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The risk assessment of pathological fracture in the proximal femur using a CT-based finite element method.
Kawabata Y; Matsuo K; Nezu Y; Kamiishi T; Inaba Y; Saito T
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Sep; 22(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28688810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Experimental validation of finite element analysis of human vertebral collapse under large compressive strains.
Hosseini HS; Clouthier AL; Zysset PK
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Apr; 136(4):. PubMed ID: 24384581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of in situ/in vitro three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography image voxel size on the finite element model of human vertebral cancellous bone.
Lu Y; Engelke K; Glueer CC; Morlock MM; Huber G
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1208-13. PubMed ID: 25500865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nonlinear finite element model predicts vertebral bone strength and fracture site.
Imai K; Ohnishi I; Bessho M; Nakamura K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(16):1789-94. PubMed ID: 16845352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Relationships between femoral strength evaluated by nonlinear finite element analysis and BMD, material distribution and geometric morphology.
Gong H; Zhang M; Fan Y; Kwok WL; Leung PC
Ann Biomed Eng; 2012 Jul; 40(7):1575-85. PubMed ID: 22258889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fabric-based Tsai-Wu yield criteria for vertebral trabecular bone in stress and strain space.
Wolfram U; Gross T; Pahr DH; Schwiedrzik J; Wilke HJ; Zysset PK
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Nov; 15():218-28. PubMed ID: 23159819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A nonlinear finite element model validation study based on a novel experimental technique for inducing anterior wedge-shape fractures in human vertebral bodies in vitro.
Dall'Ara E; Schmidt R; Pahr D; Varga P; Chevalier Y; Patsch J; Kainberger F; Zysset P
J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(12):2374-80. PubMed ID: 20462582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
