228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27142524)
1. Executive control of stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention in visual working memory.
Hu Y; Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2164-75. PubMed ID: 27142524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Executive and perceptual attention play different roles in visual working memory: evidence from suffix and strategy effects.
Hu Y; Hitch GJ; Baddeley AD; Zhang M; Allen RJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1665-1678. PubMed ID: 24933616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence for two attentional components in visual working memory.
Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1499-509. PubMed ID: 24564541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Competition for the focus of attention in visual working memory: perceptual recency versus executive control.
Hitch GJ; Hu Y; Allen RJ; Baddeley AD
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 29524359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Executive and perceptual distraction in visual working memory.
Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1677-1693. PubMed ID: 28414499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The limits of visual working memory in children: Exploring prioritization and recency effects with sequential presentation.
Berry EDJ; Waterman AH; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Allen RJ
Dev Psychol; 2018 Feb; 54(2):240-253. PubMed ID: 29154649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binding in visual working memory: the role of the episodic buffer.
Baddeley AD; Allen RJ; Hitch GJ
Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1393-400. PubMed ID: 21256143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple high-reward items can be prioritized in working memory but with greater vulnerability to interference.
Allen RJ; Ueno T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1731-1743. PubMed ID: 29968084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The contributions of visual and central attention to visual working memory.
Souza AS; Oberauer K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):1897-1916. PubMed ID: 28600676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can valuable information be prioritized in verbal working memory?
Atkinson AL; Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Waterman AH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 May; 47(5):747-764. PubMed ID: 33136420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of time on task on mind wandering and visual working memory.
Krimsky M; Forster DE; Llabre MM; Jha AP
Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():84-90. PubMed ID: 28865286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are there multiple ways to direct attention in working memory?
Atkinson AL; Berry EDJ; Waterman AH; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Allen RJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):115-126. PubMed ID: 29635690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of encoding instruction and opportunity on the recollection of behaviourally relevant events.
Broitman AW; Swallow KM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):711-725. PubMed ID: 31747827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attention is required for maintenance of feature binding in visual working memory.
Zokaei N; Heider M; Husain M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1191-213. PubMed ID: 24266343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
Koshino H
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The modality effect and echoic persistence.
Watkins OC; Watkins MJ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):251-78. PubMed ID: 6447188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The aftermath of memory retrieval for recycling visual working memory representations.
Park HB; Zhang W; Hyun JS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1393-1407. PubMed ID: 28378282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the suffix effect in serial visuospatial short-term memory.
Parmentier FB; Tremblay S; Jones DM
Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 15260195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.
Han SW
Cogn Process; 2018 Feb; 19(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 28871460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
