These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27142524)

  • 21. Action relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory.
    Heuer A; Crawford JD; Schubö A
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):413-427. PubMed ID: 27822732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.
    Meier ME; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1849-72. PubMed ID: 26120774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory.
    Marsh RL; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Mar; 24(2):336-49. PubMed ID: 9530843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations.
    van Ede F; Niklaus M; Nobre AC
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(2):437-445. PubMed ID: 28077721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Directed avoidance and its effect on visual working memory.
    Williams RS; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104277. PubMed ID: 32276234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Direct and generative retrieval of autobiographical memories: The roles of visual imagery and executive processes.
    Anderson RJ; Dewhurst SA; Dean GM
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():163-171. PubMed ID: 28214766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction.
    Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Goal-directed and stimulus-driven selection of internal representations.
    van Ede F; Board AG; Nobre AC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(39):24590-24598. PubMed ID: 32929036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Two visual working memory representations simultaneously control attention.
    Chen Y; Du F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6107. PubMed ID: 28733668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attention allocation: Relationships to general working memory or specific language processing.
    Archibald LM; Levee T; Olino T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Nov; 139():83-98. PubMed ID: 26094240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Memory-driven attentional capture reveals the waxing and waning of working memory activation due to dual-task interference.
    Sasin E; Nieuwenstein M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1891-1897. PubMed ID: 27125221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Further studies on the role of attention and stimulus repetition in item-item binding processes in visual working memory.
    Peterson DJ; Decker R; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 30024264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of working memory in visual selective attention.
    de Fockert JW; Rees G; Frith CD; Lavie N
    Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5509):1803-6. PubMed ID: 11230699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.
    Park S; Kim MS; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Learning to suppress a distractor is not affected by working memory load.
    Gao Y; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31797259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temporal dynamics of encoding, storage, and reallocation of visual working memory.
    Bays PM; Gorgoraptis N; Wee N; Marshall L; Husain M
    J Vis; 2011 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 21911739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Executive Function, Visual Attention and the Cocktail Party Problem in Musicians and Non-Musicians.
    Clayton KK; Swaminathan J; Yazdanbakhsh A; Zuk J; Patel AD; Kidd G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0157638. PubMed ID: 27384330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Concurrent performance of two memory tasks: evidence for domain-specific working memory systems.
    Cocchini G; Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Baddeley AD
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Oct; 30(7):1086-95. PubMed ID: 12507373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.