251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27142669)
1. Most Premature Surveillance Colonoscopy Is Not Attributable to Bowel Preparation or New Clinical Indications.
Desai V; Sussman DA; Greenspan M; Dayanand S; Ollington K; Patel S; Li H; Melson J
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Sep; 61(9):2496-504. PubMed ID: 27142669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.
Chokshi RV; Hovis CE; Hollander T; Early DS; Wang JS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jun; 75(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 22381531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of physician compliance with colonoscopy surveillance guidelines on interval colorectal cancer.
Nayor J; Saltzman JR; Campbell EJ; Perencevich ML; Jajoo K; Richter JM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 27889548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physician Non-adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.
Johnson MR; Grubber J; Grambow SC; Maciejewski ML; Dunn-Thomas T; Provenzale D; Fisher DA
Gastroenterology; 2015 Oct; 149(4):938-51. PubMed ID: 26122143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: are we actually adhering to the guidelines?
Walker AS; Nelson DW; Fowler JJ; Causey MW; Quade S; Johnson EK; Maykel JA; Steele SR
Am J Surg; 2013 May; 205(5):618-22; discussion 622. PubMed ID: 23592173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interval Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Role of Guideline Adherence.
Burke KE; Nayor J; Campbell EJ; Ananthakrishnan AN; Khalili H; Richter JM
Dig Dis Sci; 2020 Jan; 65(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 31367882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of a Clinical Decision Support System on Guideline Adherence of Surveillance Recommendations for Colonoscopy After Polypectomy.
Magrath M; Yang E; Ahn C; Mayorga CA; Gopal P; Murphy CC; Gupta S; Agrawal D; Halm EA; Borton EK; Skinner CS; Singal AG
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1321-1328. PubMed ID: 30442733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Split-dose bowel preparation improves adequacy of bowel preparation and gastroenterologists' adherence to National Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Guidelines.
Menees SB; Kim HM; Schoenfeld P
World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 24(6):716-724. PubMed ID: 29456410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Causes of Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers Based on World Endoscopy Organization System of Analysis.
Anderson R; Burr NE; Valori R
Gastroenterology; 2020 Apr; 158(5):1287-1299.e2. PubMed ID: 31926170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colonoscopy practice for veterans within and outside the Veterans Affairs setting: a matched cohort study.
Bartel MJ; Robertson DJ; Pohl H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Aug; 84(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 26784365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adenoma detection in excellent versus good bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
Tholey DM; Shelton CE; Francis G; Anantharaman A; Frankel RA; Shah P; Coan A; Hegarty SE; Leiby BE; Kastenberg DM
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 49(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 25494362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The appropriateness of surveillance colonoscopy intervals after polypectomy.
Schreuders E; Sint Nicolaas J; de Jonge V; van Kooten H; Soo I; Sadowski D; Wong C; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ
Can J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23378981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adherence to surveillance guidelines for colorectal adenomatous polyps in the elderly.
Puylaert CCEM; Koster-van Ree ML; Verhagen MAMT; van Tuyl SAC; Hamaker ME
Neth J Med; 2018 Oct; 76(8):358-364. PubMed ID: 30362945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.
Delavari A; Bishehsari F; Salimzadeh H; Khosravi P; Delavari F; Nasseri-Moghaddam S; Merat S; Ansari R; Vahedi H; Shahbazkhani B; Saberifiroozi M; Sotoudeh M; Malekzadeh R
BMC Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 14():196. PubMed ID: 25404264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement in colonoscopy quality metrics in clinical practice from 2000 to 2014.
Mathews SC; Zhao N; Holub JL; Lieberman D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Oct; 90(4):651-655.e3. PubMed ID: 31207221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal resource allocation in colonoscopy: timing of follow-up colonoscopies in relation to adenoma detection rates.
Sint Nicolaas J; de Jonge V; van Baalen O; Kubben FJ; Moolenaar W; Stolk MF; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME;
Endoscopy; 2013 Jul; 45(7):545-52. PubMed ID: 23580411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program--consequences for practice.
Bobridge A; Cole S; Schoeman M; Lewis H; Bampton P; Young G
Aust Fam Physician; 2013 Mar; 42(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 23529526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.
Clark BT; Rustagi T; Laine L
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724. PubMed ID: 25135006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards?
Ross WA; Thirumurthi S; Lynch PM; Rashid A; Pande M; Shafi MA; Lee JH; Raju GS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):567-74. PubMed ID: 25583558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Djinbachian R; Dubé AJ; Durand M; Camara LR; Panzini B; Bouchard S; von Renteln D
Endoscopy; 2019 Jul; 51(7):673-683. PubMed ID: 30909308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
