251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27142669)
21. Recommended intervals between screening and surveillance colonoscopies.
Baron TH; Smyrk TC; Rex DK
Mayo Clin Proc; 2013 Aug; 88(8):854-8. PubMed ID: 23910411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy.
Menees SB; Kim HM; Elliott EE; Mickevicius JL; Graustein BB; Schoenfeld PS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Sep; 78(3):510-6. PubMed ID: 23642491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Overuse of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.
Kruse GR; Khan SM; Zaslavsky AM; Ayanian JZ; Sequist TD
J Gen Intern Med; 2015 Mar; 30(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 25266407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.
Denis B; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Exbrayat C; Piette C; Dancourt V; Foll Y; Ait Hadad H; Bailly L; Perrin P
Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Feb; 46(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24054769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of the consideration of serrated polyps to the interval of colonoscopic surveillance in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
Pullens B; Dekker E; Ellis AJ; Guy R; Madronal K; Chetty R; East JE
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Sep; 16(9):O320-6. PubMed ID: 24592946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Young patients with sporadic colorectal adenomas: current endoscopic surveillance practices and outcomes.
Cha JM; La Selva D; Kozarek RA; Gluck M; Ross A; Lin OS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Nov; 88(5):818-825.e1. PubMed ID: 29908175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multi-center colonoscopy quality measurement utilizing natural language processing.
Imler TD; Morea J; Kahi C; Sherer EA; Cardwell J; Johnson CS; Xu H; Ahnen D; Antaki F; Ashley C; Baffy G; Cho I; Dominitz J; Hou J; Korsten M; Nagar A; Promrat K; Robertson D; Saini S; Shergill A; Smalley W; Imperiale TF
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 110(4):543-52. PubMed ID: 25756240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical practice guidelines: quality of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.
Jover R; Herráiz M; Alarcón O; Brullet E; Bujanda L; Bustamante M; Campo R; Carreño R; Castells A; Cubiella J; García-Iglesias P; Hervás AJ; Menchén P; Ono A; Panadés A; Parra-Blanco A; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Quintero E; Reñé JM; Sánchez del Río A; Seoane A; Serradesanferm A; Soriano Izquierdo A; Vázquez Sequeiros E; ;
Endoscopy; 2012 Apr; 44(4):444-51. PubMed ID: 22438159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Yield of second surveillance colonoscopy to predict adenomas with high-risk characteristics.
Laish I; Blechman I; Feingelernt H; Konikoff FM
Dig Liver Dis; 2015 Sep; 47(9):805-10. PubMed ID: 26048253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.
Chokshi RV; Hovis CE; Colditz GA; Early DS; Wang JS
Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Aug; 58(8):2151-5. PubMed ID: 23535876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.
Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 Mar; 90(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 7872270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Colonoscopy quality assessment.
Fayad NF; Kahi CJ
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2015 Apr; 25(2):373-86. PubMed ID: 25839691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adherence to recommended intervals for surveillance colonoscopy in average-risk patients with 1 to 2 small (<1 cm) polyps on screening colonoscopy.
Menees SB; Elliott E; Govani S; Anastassiades C; Schoenfeld P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Apr; 79(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 24630082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Open Access Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: An Evaluation of Appropriateness and Quality.
Kapila N; Singh H; Kandragunta K; Castro FJ
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2798-2805. PubMed ID: 30955174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of bowel preparation on surveillance colonoscopy interval.
Singhal S; Virk MA; Momeni M; Krishnaiah M; Anand S
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):885-90. PubMed ID: 24902032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inflammatory bowel disease cancer surveillance in a tertiary referral hospital: attitudes and practice.
Verschuren EC; Ong DE; Kamm MA; Desmond PV; Lust M
Intern Med J; 2014 Jan; 44(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 24015799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Guideline Adherence to Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals after Polypectomy in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Survey.
Hong S; Suh M; Choi KS; Park B; Cha JM; Kim HS; Jun JK; Han DS
Gut Liver; 2018 Jul; 12(4):426-432. PubMed ID: 29429156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Advances in bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
Cohen LB
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2015 Apr; 25(2):183-97. PubMed ID: 25839681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy.
Imperiale TF; Glowinski EA; Juliar BE; Azzouz F; Ransohoff DF
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jun; 69(7):1288-95. PubMed ID: 19481649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
