305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27142822)
1. Ten-year experience in the management of distal ureteral stones greater than 10 mm in size.
Dell'Atti L; Papa S
G Chir; 2016; 37(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 27142822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.
Wu CF; Chen CS; Lin WY; Shee JJ; Lin CL; Chen Y; Huang WS
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 15893812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outpatient treatment of middle and lower ureteric stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy.
Yip SK; Lee FC; Tam PC; Leung SY
Ann Acad Med Singap; 1998 Jul; 27(4):515-9. PubMed ID: 9791657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis.
Cui X; Ji F; Yan H; Ou TW; Jia CS; He XZ; Gao W; Wang Q; Cui B; Wu JT
Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):748-56. PubMed ID: 25681251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of YAG Laser Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Meta-Analysis.
Yang C; Li S; Cui Y
Urol Int; 2017; 98(4):373-381. PubMed ID: 27798945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of Proximal Ureteric Stones: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Versus Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy (URSL).
Joshi HN; Shrestha B; Karmacharya RM; Makaju S; Koju R; Gyawali D
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2017 Oct.-Dec.; 15(60):343-346. PubMed ID: 30580354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Compare the outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with ureteroscopic management after failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi].
Wang DW; Wang JY; Cao XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 47(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 19570385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized study.
Qi S; Li Y; Liu X; Zhang C; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Xu Y
J Endourol; 2014 Sep; 28(9):1064-70. PubMed ID: 24786613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ESWL and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in management of ureteral stones.
Cui Y; Cao W; Shen H; Xie J; Adams TS; Zhang Y; Shao Q
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87634. PubMed ID: 24498344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outpatient holmium laser lithotripsy using semirigid ureteroscope. Is the treatment outcome affected by stone load?
Cheung MC; Lee F; Yip SK; Tam PC
Eur Urol; 2001 Jun; 39(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 11464061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones. A comparative study].
Xue ZY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Apr; 29(4):235-7, 271. PubMed ID: 1874112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.
Strohmaier WL; Schubert G; Rosenkranz T; Weigl A
Eur Urol; 1999 Nov; 36(5):376-9. PubMed ID: 10516445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal therapy for the distal ureteral stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy.
Anderson KR; Keetch DW; Albala DM; Chandhoke PS; McClennan BL; Clayman RV
J Urol; 1994 Jul; 152(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 8201689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm.
Shao Y; Wang DW; Lu GL; Shen ZJ
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1841-5. PubMed ID: 25822707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial.
Wang Y; Zhong B; Yang X; Wang G; Hou P; Meng J
BMC Urol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):50. PubMed ID: 28662708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
