These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27143497)

  • 1. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
    Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
    Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening invitation letters.
    Decker KM; Turner D; Demers AA; Martens PJ; Lambert P; Chateau D
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2013 Aug; 22(8):687-93. PubMed ID: 23915107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Women's Behaviors Toward Mammogram and Pap Test: Opportunities to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Participation Rates among Older Women.
    Tavasoli SM; Kane E; Chiarelli AM; Kupets R
    Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 29174212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acceptability of reminder letters for Papanicolaou tests: a survey of women from 23 Family Health Networks in Ontario.
    Karwalajtys T; Kaczorowski J; Lohfeld L; Laryea S; Anderson K; Roder S; Sebaldt RJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2007 Oct; 29(10):829-34. PubMed ID: 17915066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.
    Racey CS; Gesink DC; Burchell AN; Trivers S; Wong T; Rebbapragada A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 May; 25(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 26598955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
    Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Recall and Reminder Letters on Retention Rates in an Organized Cervical Screening Program.
    Tsoa E; Kone Pefoyo AJ; Tsiplova K; Kupets R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Oct; 39(10):845-853. PubMed ID: 28733059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A team care model of cervical 
screening in a general practice.
    Rennie D; Boxsell J; Pedretti K
    Aust Fam Physician; 2015 Jul; 44(7):515-8. PubMed ID: 26590499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-sampling versus reminder letter: effects on cervical cancer screening attendance and coverage in Finland.
    Virtanen A; Anttila A; Luostarinen T; Nieminen P
    Int J Cancer; 2011 Jun; 128(11):2681-7. PubMed ID: 20669228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
    Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limitations in Correspondence Programs for Cervical Cancer Screening: Who Are the Women We Are Missing?
    Clark M; Lee A; Kupets R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1410-1415. PubMed ID: 30803876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening.
    Bowles EJ; Gao H; Brandzel S; Bradford SC; Buist DS
    Prev Med; 2016 May; 86():19-27. PubMed ID: 26820221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Buehler SK; Parsons WL
    CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study of the effects of historical patient compliance and a population-based informatics prompted reminder on screening rates.
    MacLaughlin KL; Swanson KM; Naessens JM; Angstman KB; Chaudhry R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Apr; 20(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 24237657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of Patient-Directed Cytology Results Correspondence Program on Follow-Up of High-Grade Pap Tests.
    Tavasoli SM; Kane E; Kupets R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1461-1469. PubMed ID: 31053566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Cancer Screening Using a Systematic Invitation System in Lithuania.
    Paulauskiene J; Stelemekas M; Ivanauskiene R; Petkeviciene J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31835649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How much does a reminder letter increase cervical screening among under-screened women in NSW?
    Morrell S; Taylor R; Zeckendorf S; Niciak A; Wain G; Ross J
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 29(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 15782877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can an appointment-letter intervention increase pap smear screening in Samliem, Khon Kaen, Thailand?
    Chumworathayi B; Yuenyao P; Luanratanakorn S; Pattamadilok J; Chalapati W; Na-Nhongkai C
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(3):353-6. PubMed ID: 18159966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Self-sampling and reminder letters increase participation in the Finnish cervical cancer screening programme].
    Virtanen A; Nieminen P; Malila N; Luostarinen T; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2013; 129(16):1709-17. PubMed ID: 24069641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A quasi-randomized trial on the effectiveness of an invitation letter to improve participation in a setting of opportunistic screening for cervical cancer.
    de Jonge E; Cloes E; Op de Beeck L; Adriaens B; Lousbergh D; Orye GG; Buntinx F
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Jun; 17(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 18414195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.