200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27144499)
1. Development and application of the SSD approach in scientific case studies for ecological risk assessment.
Del Signore A; Hendriks AJ; Lenders HJ; Leuven RS; Breure AM
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Sep; 35(9):2149-61. PubMed ID: 27144499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.
Belanger S; Barron M; Craig P; Dyer S; Galay-Burgos M; Hamer M; Marshall S; Posthuma L; Raimondo S; Whitehouse P
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):664-674. PubMed ID: 27531323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can Chemical Toxicity in Saltwater Be Predicted from Toxicity in Freshwater? A Comprehensive Evaluation Using Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Yanagihara M; Hiki K; Iwasaki Y
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Aug; 41(8):2021-2027. PubMed ID: 35502940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of aquatic toxicity benchmarks for oil products using species sensitivity distributions.
Barron MG; Hemmer MJ; Jackson CR
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):610-5. PubMed ID: 23554001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models.
Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Jackson CR; Barron MG
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 24214839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protectiveness of species sensitivity distribution hazard concentrations for acute toxicity used in endangered species risk assessment.
Raimondo S; Vivian DN; Delos C; Barron MG
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Dec; 27(12):2599-607. PubMed ID: 18699704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correcting for Phylogenetic Autocorrelation in Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Moore DR; Priest CD; Galic N; Brain RA; Rodney SI
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Jan; 16(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 31433110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SSDs revisited: part II-practical considerations in the development and use of application factors applied to species sensitivity distributions.
Belanger SE; Carr GJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Jul; 38(7):1526-1541. PubMed ID: 30994956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Misunderstandings and errors in the methods for assessment factors versus species sensitivity distributions".
Belanger SE; Carr GJ
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Jul; 198():110684. PubMed ID: 32408188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems.
Maltby L; Blake N; Brock TC; van den Brink PJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2005 Feb; 24(2):379-88. PubMed ID: 15719998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Species sensitivity distribution evaluation for chronic nickel toxicity to marine organisms.
DeForest DK; Schlekat CE
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):580-9. PubMed ID: 23553986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mean Species Abundance as a Measure of Ecotoxicological Risk.
Hoeks S; Huijbregts MAJ; Douziech M; Hendriks AJ; Oldenkamp R
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Nov; 39(11):2304-2313. PubMed ID: 32786097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relevance of generic and site-specific species sensitivity distributions in the current risk assessment procedures for copper and zinc.
Bossuyt BT; Muyssen BT; Janssen CR
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2005 Feb; 24(2):470-8. PubMed ID: 15720010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A probabilistic method for species sensitivity distributions taking into account the inherent uncertainty and variability of effects to estimate environmental risk.
Gottschalk F; Nowack B
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 22745057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. QSAR-Based Estimation of Species Sensitivity Distribution Parameters: An Exploratory Investigation.
Hoondert RPJ; Oldenkamp R; de Zwart D; van de Meent D; Posthuma L
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Dec; 38(12):2764-2770. PubMed ID: 31553801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing species sensitivity distributions for metallic nanomaterials considering the characteristics of nanomaterials, experimental conditions, and different types of endpoints.
Chen G; Peijnenburg WJGM; Xiao Y; Vijver MG
Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 112():563-570. PubMed ID: 28390859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Species sensitivity distribution for pentachlorophenol to aquatic organisms based on interval ecotoxicological data.
Zhao J; Zhang R
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Nov; 145():193-199. PubMed ID: 28734222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Constructing Time-Resolved Species Sensitivity Distributions Using a Hierarchical Toxico-Dynamic Model.
Kon Kam King G; Delignette-Muller ML; Kefford BJ; Piscart C; Charles S
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12465-73. PubMed ID: 26406398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Making species salinity sensitivity distributions reflective of naturally occurring communities: using rapid testing and Bayesian statistics.
Hickey GL; Kefford BJ; Dunlop JE; Craig PS
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Nov; 27(11):2403-11. PubMed ID: 18522453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliable and Representative Estimation of Extrapolation Model Application in Deriving Water Quality Criteria for Antibiotics.
Cao L; Liu R; Wang L; Liu Y; Li L; Wang Y
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2023 Jan; 42(1):191-204. PubMed ID: 36342347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
