These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27144540)

  • 1. Psychosocial Factors in Patients Indicated for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery.
    Nechanicka N; Barsa P; Harsa P
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 77(5):432-40. PubMed ID: 27144540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Discogenic low back pain and degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis - how appropriate is surgical treatment?].
    Mayer HM
    Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 11793155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of catastrophising on treatment outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Park JW; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1546-54. PubMed ID: 26530659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pretreatment psychosocial variables as predictors of outcomes following lumbar surgery and spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review and literature synthesis.
    Celestin J; Edwards RR; Jamison RN
    Pain Med; 2009; 10(4):639-53. PubMed ID: 19638142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence].
    Robaina-Padrón FJ
    Neurocirugia (Astur); 2007 Oct; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 18008014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Spratt KF; Keller TS; Szpalski M; Vandeputte K; Gunzburg R
    Eur Spine J; 2004 Feb; 13(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 14658061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of preoperative spinal sagittal balance on clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25840041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical depression is a strong predictor of poor lumbar fusion outcomes among workers' compensation subjects.
    Anderson JT; Haas AR; Percy R; Woods ST; Ahn UM; Ahn NU
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(10):748-56. PubMed ID: 25955092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of prognostic predictors of percutaneous adhesiolysis using a Racz catheter for post lumbar surgery syndrome or spinal stenosis.
    Choi E; Nahm FS; Lee PB
    Pain Physician; 2013; 16(5):E531-6. PubMed ID: 24077203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Owens R; Karikari I; Agarwal V; Gottfried ON; Bagley CA; Isaacs RE; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 23231358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of surgical treatment of adult idiopathic scoliosis with low back pain and spinal stenosis: a study of long-term clinical radiographic outcomes.
    Shapiro GS; Taira G; Boachie-Adjei O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 12590210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting outcome in the surgical treatment of lumbar radiculopathy using the Pain Drawing Score, McGill Short Form Pain Questionnaire, and risk factors including psychosocial issues and axial joint pain.
    Voorhies RM; Jiang X; Thomas N
    Spine J; 2007; 7(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 17905313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study.
    Sinikallio S; Aalto T; Airaksinen O; Herno A; Kröger H; Viinamäki H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2573-8. PubMed ID: 19927107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 10: lumbar fusion for stenosis without spondylolisthesis.
    Resnick DK; Watters WC; Mummaneni PV; Dailey AT; Choudhri TF; Eck JC; Sharan A; Groff MW; Wang JC; Ghogawala Z; Dhall SS; Kaiser MG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 24980587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
    Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
    Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arguments for the choice of surgical treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis - a systematic appraisal of randomized controlled trials.
    Burgstaller JM; Porchet F; Steurer J; Wertli MM
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():96. PubMed ID: 25896506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.