These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27144541)

  • 1. A Novel Mobile Phone Application for Pulse Pressure Variation Monitoring Based on Feature Extraction Technology: A Method Comparison Study in a Simulated Environment.
    Desebbe O; Joosten A; Suehiro K; Lahham S; Essiet M; Rinehart J; Cannesson M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Jul; 123(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 27144541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ability of a New Smartphone Pulse Pressure Variation and Cardiac Output Application to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
    Joosten A; Boudart C; Vincent JL; Vanden Eynden F; Barvais L; Van Obbergh L; Rinehart J; Desebbe O
    Anesth Analg; 2019 Jun; 128(6):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 31094781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monitoring of pulse pressure variation using a new smartphone application (Capstesia) versus stroke volume variation using an uncalibrated pulse wave analysis monitor: a clinical decision making study during major abdominal surgery.
    Joosten A; Jacobs A; Desebbe O; Vincent JL; Sarah S; Rinehart J; Van Obbergh L; Hapfelmeier A; Saugel B
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2019 Oct; 33(5):787-793. PubMed ID: 30607806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of a smartphone app (Capstesia) for measuring pulse pressure variation: agreement between two methods: A Cross-sectional study.
    Barrachina B; Cobos R; Mardones N; Castañeda A; Vinuesa C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Feb; 34(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 28002069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
    Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output.
    Bubenek-Turconi SI; Craciun M; Miclea I; Perel A
    Anesth Analg; 2013 Aug; 117(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 23757471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
    Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of systolic pressure variation during graded volume loss using simple tools on Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor.
    Durga P; Jonnavittula N; Muthuchellappan R; Ramachandran G
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 19295396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiac output monitoring: A comparative prospective observational study of the conventional cardiac output monitor Vigileo™ and the new smartphone-based application Capstesia™.
    Shah SB; Bhargava AK; Hariharan U; Vishvakarma G; Jain CR; Kansal A
    Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Aug; 62(8):584-591. PubMed ID: 30166652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of pulse pressure variation and cardiac output in patients having major abdominal surgery: a comparison between a mobile application for snapshot pulse wave analysis and invasive pulse wave analysis.
    Hoppe P; Gleibs F; Briesenick L; Joosten A; Saugel B
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2021 Oct; 35(5):1203-1209. PubMed ID: 32749570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting fluid responsiveness during infrarenal aortic cross-clamping in pigs.
    Biais M; Calderon J; Pernot M; Barandon L; Couffinhal T; Ouattara A; Sztark F
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1101-7. PubMed ID: 24060469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of the CNAP™ monitor, a noninvasive continuous blood pressure device, in providing beat-to-beat blood pressure readings in pediatric patients weighing 20-40 kilograms.
    Kako H; Corridore M; Rice J; Tobias JD
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Nov; 23(11):989-93. PubMed ID: 23565770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index.
    Fischer MO; Pelissier A; Bohadana D; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL; Fellahi JL
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 23992654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, and plethysmographic variability index in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy].
    Liu YF; Song LL; Xing MW; Cai LX; Wang DX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):946-951. PubMed ID: 34650300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-invasive measurement of pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation using a finger cuff corresponds with intra-arterial measurement.
    Lansdorp B; Ouweneel D; de Keijzer A; van der Hoeven JG; Lemson J; Pickkers P
    Br J Anaesth; 2011 Oct; 107(4):540-5. PubMed ID: 21700612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a novel automated non-invasive pulse pressure variation algorithm.
    Schmid M; Prettenthaler H; Weger C; Smolle KH
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Oct; 43(10):1583-9. PubMed ID: 24034750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new noninvasive finger sensor (NICCI system) for continuous blood pressure and pulse pressure variation monitoring: A method comparison study in patients having neurosurgery.
    Flick M; Bergholz A; Kouz K; Breitfeld P; Nitzschke R; Flotzinger D; Saugel B
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2022 Nov; 39(11):851-857. PubMed ID: 36155392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients: comparison with four other dynamic indices.
    Monnet X; Dres M; Ferré A; Le Teuff G; Jozwiak M; Bleibtreu A; Le Deley MC; Chemla D; Richard C; Teboul JL
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Sep; 109(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 22735299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multicenter study verifying a method of noninvasive continuous cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time: a comparison with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output.
    Yamada T; Tsutsui M; Sugo Y; Sato T; Akazawa T; Sato N; Yamashita K; Ishihara H; Takeda J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 Jul; 115(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22467885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated, continuous and non-invasive assessment of pulse pressure variations using CNAP
    Biais M; Stecken L; Martin A; Roullet S; Quinart A; Sztark F
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):685-692. PubMed ID: 27312841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.