These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27144541)
21. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method. Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A new noninvasive finger sensor (NICCI system) for continuous blood pressure and pulse pressure variation monitoring: A method comparison study in patients having neurosurgery. Flick M; Bergholz A; Kouz K; Breitfeld P; Nitzschke R; Flotzinger D; Saugel B Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2022 Nov; 39(11):851-857. PubMed ID: 36155392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance of Masimo rainbow acoustic monitoring for tracking changing respiratory rates under laryngeal mask airway general anesthesia for surgical procedures in the operating room: a prospective observational study. Atkins JH; Mandel JE Anesth Analg; 2014 Dec; 119(6):1307-14. PubMed ID: 25025587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of smartphone application-based vital sign monitors without external hardware versus those used in clinical practice: a prospective trial. Alexander JC; Minhajuddin A; Joshi GP J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):825-831. PubMed ID: 27170014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of augmented pulse pressure variation using the Valsalva manoeuvre as a predictor of fluid responsiveness under open-chest conditions: A prospective observational study. Min JJ; Kim TK; Lee JH; Park J; Cho HS; Kim WS; Lee YT Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 May; 34(5):254-261. PubMed ID: 28207430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach. Biais M; Ehrmann S; Mari A; Conte B; Mahjoub Y; Desebbe O; Pottecher J; Lakhal K; Benzekri-Lefevre D; Molinari N; Boulain T; Lefrant JY; Muller L; Crit Care; 2014 Nov; 18(6):587. PubMed ID: 25658489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ventilation-Induced Modulation of Pulse Oximeter Waveforms: A Method for the Assessment of Early Changes in Intravascular Volume During Spinal Fusion Surgery in Pediatric Patients. Alian AA; Atteya G; Gaal D; Golembeski T; Smith BG; Dai F; Silverman DG; Shelley K Anesth Analg; 2016 Aug; 123(2):346-56. PubMed ID: 27284998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing liver transplantation: validity of a third-generation device. Su BC; Tsai YF; Chen CY; Yu HP; Yang MW; Lee WC; Lin CC Transplant Proc; 2012 Mar; 44(2):424-8. PubMed ID: 22410034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The accuracy and responsiveness of continuous noninvasive arterial pressure during rapid ventricular pacing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Schramm C; Huber A; Plaschke K Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 23687235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Visual estimation of pulse pressure variation is not reliable: a randomized simulation study. Rinehart J; Islam T; Boud R; Nguyen A; Alexander B; Canales C; Cannesson M J Clin Monit Comput; 2012 Jun; 26(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 22491961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic arterial elastance obtained using arterial signal does not predict an increase in arterial pressure after a volume expansion in the operating room. Lanchon R; Nouette-Gaulain K; Stecken L; Sesay M; Lefrant JY; Biais M Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2017 Dec; 36(6):377-382. PubMed ID: 28694225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of the Nexfin™ device to detect acute arterial pressure variations during anaesthesia induction. Weiss E; Gayat E; Dumans-Nizard V; Le Guen M; Fischler M Br J Anaesth; 2014 Jul; 113(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 24771806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure and pulse pressure variation measured with Nexfin(®) in patients following major upper abdominal surgery: a comparative study. de Wilde RB; de Wit F; Geerts BF; van Vliet AL; Aarts LP; Vuyk J; Jansen JR Anaesthesia; 2016 Jul; 71(7):788-97. PubMed ID: 27291598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The CNAP™ Finger Cuff for Noninvasive Beat-To-Beat Monitoring of Arterial Blood Pressure: An Evaluation in Intensive Care Unit Patients and a Comparison with 2 Intermittent Devices. Lakhal K; Martin M; Faiz S; Ehrmann S; Blanloeil Y; Asehnoune K; Rozec B; Boulain T Anesth Analg; 2016 Nov; 123(5):1126-1135. PubMed ID: 27159068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Real-time, spectral analysis of the arterial pressure waveform using a wirelessly-connected, tablet computer: a pilot study. Pybus DA J Clin Monit Comput; 2019 Feb; 33(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 29705865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Continuous Non-invasive finger cuff CareTaker® comparable to invasive intra-arterial pressure in patients undergoing major intra-abdominal surgery. Gratz I; Deal E; Spitz F; Baruch M; Allen IE; Seaman JE; Pukenas E; Jean S BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28327093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cephalic versus digital plethysmographic variability index measurement: a comparative pilot study in cardiac surgery patients. Fischer MO; Pellissier A; Saplacan V; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL; Fellahi JL J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1510-5. PubMed ID: 25263772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An accuracy evaluation of the T-Line Tensymeter (continuous noninvasive blood pressure management device) versus conventional invasive radial artery monitoring in surgical patients. Janelle GM; Gravenstein N Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):484-90. PubMed ID: 16428547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]