834 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27144966)
1. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dr Google: The readability and accuracy of patient education websites for Graves' disease treatment.
Purdy AC; Idriss A; Ahern S; Lin E; Elfenbein DM
Surgery; 2017 Nov; 162(5):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 28864099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Assessment of Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Educational Resources for Platelet-Rich Plasma.
Ghodasra JH; Wang D; Jayakar RG; Jensen AR; Yamaguchi KT; Hegde VV; Jones KJ
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jan; 34(1):272-278. PubMed ID: 28784239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.
Azer SA; Alghofaili MM; Alsultan RM; Alrumaih NS
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):926-944. PubMed ID: 28281091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet.
Azer SA; AlOlayan TI; AlGhamdi MA; AlSanea MA
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 23(9):1676-1696. PubMed ID: 28321169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.
Samuel D; Vilardo N; Isani SS; Kuo DYS; Gressel GM
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):616-621. PubMed ID: 31324452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the Accuracy, Quality, and Readability of Information Related to the Surgical Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Bouhadana D; Nguyen DD; Raizenne B; Vangala SK; Sadri I; Chughtai B; Elterman DS; Zorn KC; Bhojani N
J Endourol; 2022 Apr; 36(4):528-534. PubMed ID: 34731024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the Accuracy of Online Information Regarding Trigger Finger.
Hinds RM; Gottschalk MB; Muppavarapu RC; Naik AA; Yang SS; Capo JT
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2016 Jun; 21(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 27454633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials Related to Breast Lesions Requiring Surgery.
Miles RC; Baird GL; Choi P; Falomo E; Dibble EH; Garg M
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 30694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What Patients Look for When Browsing Online for Pancreatic Cancer: The Bait Behind the Byte.
Storino A; Guetter C; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Mancias JD; Bullock A; James Moser A; Kent TS
World J Surg; 2018 Dec; 42(12):4097-4106. PubMed ID: 29971463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readability of consumer health information on the internet: a comparison of U.S. government-funded and commercially funded websites.
Risoldi Cochrane Z; Gregory P; Wilson A
J Health Commun; 2012; 17(9):1003-10. PubMed ID: 22512714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer.
Garfinkle R; Wong-Chong N; Petrucci A; Sylla P; Wexner SD; Bhatnagar S; Morin N; Boutros M
Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 21(5):523-531. PubMed ID: 30609222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.
Bompastore NJ; Cisu T; Holoch P
Urology; 2018 Aug; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 29723588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
