These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27145262)

  • 1. Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Poses via a Combination of Induced Fit Docking and Metadynamics Simulations.
    Clark AJ; Tiwary P; Borrelli K; Feng S; Miller EB; Abel R; Friesner RA; Berne BJ
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Jun; 12(6):2990-8. PubMed ID: 27145262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the Stability of Ligand Binding Modes to Proteins by Molecular Dynamics Simulations: A Cross-docking Study.
    Liu K; Kokubo H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Oct; 57(10):2514-2522. PubMed ID: 28902511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CHARMM-GUI-Based Induced Fit Docking Workflow to Generate Reliable Protein-Ligand Binding Modes.
    Guterres H; Im W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Aug; 63(15):4772-4779. PubMed ID: 37462607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structure-Based Site of Metabolism (SOM) Prediction of Ligand for CYP3A4 Enzyme: Comparison of Glide XP and Induced Fit Docking (IFD).
    Lokwani DK; Sarkate AP; Karnik KS; Nikalje APG; Seijas JA
    Molecules; 2020 Apr; 25(7):. PubMed ID: 32244772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying Dopamine D3 Receptor Ligands through Virtual Screening and Exploring the Binding Modes of Hit Compounds.
    Jin H; Wu C; Su R; Sun T; Li X; Guo C
    Molecules; 2023 Jan; 28(2):. PubMed ID: 36677583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ensemble-based docking using biased molecular dynamics.
    Campbell AJ; Lamb ML; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2127-38. PubMed ID: 24881672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of various electrostatic potentials on docking precision against cyclin-dependent kinase 2 protein: a multiple docking approach.
    Tripathi SK; Soundarya RN; Singh P; Singh SK
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2015 Feb; 85(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 24923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics Simulations, Computational Screening to Design Quorum Sensing Inhibitors Targeting LuxP of Vibrio harveyi and Its Biological Evaluation.
    Rajamanikandan S; Jeyakanthan J; Srinivasan P
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2017 Jan; 181(1):192-218. PubMed ID: 27535409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of binding poses to FXR using multi-targeted docking combined with molecular dynamics and enhanced sampling.
    Bhakat S; Åberg E; Söderhjelm P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 29052792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic Docking: A Paradigm Shift in Computational Drug Discovery.
    Gioia D; Bertazzo M; Recanatini M; Masetti M; Cavalli A
    Molecules; 2017 Nov; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 29165360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring the stability of ligand binding modes to proteins by molecular dynamics simulations.
    Liu K; Watanabe E; Kokubo H
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Feb; 31(2):201-211. PubMed ID: 28074360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of molecular dynamics on drug design: applications for the characterization of ligand-macromolecule complexes.
    Mortier J; Rakers C; Bermudez M; Murgueitio MS; Riniker S; Wolber G
    Drug Discov Today; 2015 Jun; 20(6):686-702. PubMed ID: 25615716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Robust Induced Fit Docking Approach with the Combination of the Hybrid All-Atom/United-Atom/Coarse-Grained Model and Simulated Annealing.
    Lu D; Luo D; Zhang Y; Wang B
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Jul; 20(14):6414-6423. PubMed ID: 38966989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Docking with AutoDock4.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; Pintro VO; de Azevedo WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():125-148. PubMed ID: 31452103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extensive consensus docking evaluation for ligand pose prediction and virtual screening studies.
    Tuccinardi T; Poli G; Romboli V; Giordano A; Martinelli A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2980-6. PubMed ID: 25211541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
    Renner S; Derksen S; Radestock S; Mörchen F
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.