These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27145262)

  • 41. GWOVina: A grey wolf optimization approach to rigid and flexible receptor docking.
    Wong KM; Tai HK; Siu SWI
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2021 Jan; 97(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 32679606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Extra precision docking, free energy calculation and molecular dynamics simulation studies of CDK2 inhibitors.
    Tripathi SK; Muttineni R; Singh SK
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Oct; 334():87-100. PubMed ID: 23727278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Discovery of new non-steroidal FXR ligands via a virtual screening workflow based on Phase shape and induced fit docking.
    Fu J; Si P; Zheng M; Chen L; Shen X; Tang Y; Li W
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2012 Nov; 22(22):6848-53. PubMed ID: 23040732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Scoring functions for prediction of protein-ligand interactions.
    Wang JC; Lin JH
    Curr Pharm Des; 2013; 19(12):2174-82. PubMed ID: 23016847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Molecular Docking Simulations with ArgusLab.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():203-220. PubMed ID: 31452107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improving the Accuracy of Protein-Ligand Binding Mode Prediction Using a Molecular Dynamics-Based Pocket Generation Approach.
    Araki M; Iwata H; Ma B; Fujita A; Terayama K; Sagae Y; Ono F; Tsuda K; Kamiya N; Okuno Y
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Dec; 39(32):2679-2689. PubMed ID: 30515903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Biased Docking for Protein-Ligand Pose Prediction.
    Arcon JP; Turjanski AG; Martí MA; Forli S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():39-72. PubMed ID: 33759120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Inhibitor design against JNK1 through e-pharmacophore modeling docking and molecular dynamics simulations.
    Katari SK; Natarajan P; Swargam S; Kanipakam H; Pasala C; Umamaheswari A
    J Recept Signal Transduct Res; 2016 Dec; 36(6):558-571. PubMed ID: 26906522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. HybridDock: A Hybrid Protein-Ligand Docking Protocol Integrating Protein- and Ligand-Based Approaches.
    Huang SY; Li M; Wang J; Pan Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1078-87. PubMed ID: 26317502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Integrating Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Santos LHS; Ferreira RS; Caffarena ER
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():13-34. PubMed ID: 31452096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5.
    Moustakas DT; Lang PT; Pegg S; Pettersen E; Kuntz ID; Brooijmans N; Rizzo RC
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2006; 20(10-11):601-19. PubMed ID: 17149653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Assessing an ensemble docking-based virtual screening strategy for kinase targets by considering protein flexibility.
    Tian S; Sun H; Pan P; Li D; Zhen X; Li Y; Hou T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2664-79. PubMed ID: 25233367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Protein-ligand-based pharmacophores: generation and utility assessment in computational ligand profiling.
    Meslamani J; Li J; Sutter J; Stevens A; Bertrand HO; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr; 52(4):943-55. PubMed ID: 22480372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Machine learning accelerates MD-based binding pose prediction between ligands and proteins.
    Terayama K; Iwata H; Araki M; Okuno Y; Tsuda K
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Mar; 34(5):770-778. PubMed ID: 29040432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. E-pharmacophore-based virtual screening to identify GSK-3β inhibitors.
    Natarajan P; Priyadarshini V; Pradhan D; Manne M; Swargam S; Kanipakam H; Bhuma V; Amineni U
    J Recept Signal Transduct Res; 2016 Oct; 36(5):445-58. PubMed ID: 27305963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fully Flexible Docking via Reaction-Coordinate-Independent Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Bertazzo M; Bernetti M; Recanatini M; Masetti M; Cavalli A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Feb; 58(2):490-500. PubMed ID: 29378136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Molegro Virtual Docker for Docking.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():149-167. PubMed ID: 31452104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the effects of structural water and electronic polarization.
    Liu J; He X; Zhang JZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 23651068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Binding Affinity via Docking: Fact and Fiction.
    Pantsar T; Poso A
    Molecules; 2018 Jul; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 30061498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Using metadynamics and path collective variables to study ligand binding and induced conformational transitions.
    Bešker N; Gervasio FL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 819():501-13. PubMed ID: 22183554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.