564 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27145311)
1. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive surgery and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer.
Yeo HL; Abelson JS; Mao J; Cheerharan M; Milsom J; Sedrakyan A
J Surg Res; 2016 May; 202(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27229104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A National Database Analysis Comparing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Laparoscopic vs Open Colectomies: Inherent Variance May Impact Outcomes.
Schlussel AT; Delaney CP; Maykel JA; Lustik MB; Nishtala M; Steele SR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Sep; 59(9):843-54. PubMed ID: 27505113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.
Vasudevan V; Reusche R; Wallace H; Kaza S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5490-5493. PubMed ID: 27126626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term outcomes for robotic colorectal surgery by provider volume.
Keller DS; Hashemi L; Lu M; Delaney CP
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Dec; 217(6):1063-9.e1. PubMed ID: 24041555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do the advantages of a minimally invasive approach remain in complex colorectal procedures? A nationwide comparison.
Schlussel AT; Lustik MB; Johnson EK; Maykel JA; Champagne BJ; Goldberg JE; Steele SR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Apr; 58(4):431-43. PubMed ID: 25751800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes after Laparoscopic vs Robotic Colectomy.
Miller PE; Dao H; Paluvoi N; Bailey M; Margolin D; Shah N; Vargas HD
J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Aug; 223(2):369-73. PubMed ID: 27109780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Growth of laparoscopic colectomy in the United States: analysis of regional and socioeconomic factors over time.
Bardakcioglu O; Khan A; Aldridge C; Chen J
Ann Surg; 2013 Aug; 258(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 23598378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers.
Simorov A; Shaligram A; Shostrom V; Boilesen E; Thompson J; Oleynikov D
Ann Surg; 2012 Sep; 256(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 22868361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variations in Laparoscopic Colectomy Utilization in the United States.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Carmichael JC; Mills S; Pigazzi A; Nguyen NT; Stamos MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Oct; 58(10):950-6. PubMed ID: 26347967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era.
Tyler JA; Fox JP; Desai MM; Perry WB; Glasgow SC
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Apr; 56(4):458-66. PubMed ID: 23478613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The current status of emergent laparoscopic colectomy: a population-based study of clinical and financial outcomes.
Keller DS; Pedraza R; Flores-Gonzalez JR; LeFave JP; Mahmood A; Haas EM
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3321-6. PubMed ID: 26490770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of Pediatric Open, Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation in the United States: 2000 to 2012.
Bowen DK; Faasse MA; Liu DB; Gong EM; Lindgren BW; Johnson EK
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):207-12. PubMed ID: 26880414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database.
Delaney CP; Chang E; Senagore AJ; Broder M
Ann Surg; 2008 May; 247(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 18438119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic Technology in Emergency General Surgery Cases in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery.
Lunardi N; Abou-Zamzam A; Florecki KL; Chidambaram S; Shih IF; Kent AJ; Joseph B; Byrne JP; Sakran JV
JAMA Surg; 2024 May; 159(5):493-499. PubMed ID: 38446451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospital readmissions and emergency department visits following laparoscopic and open colon resection for cancer.
Hansen DG; Fox JP; Gross CP; Bruun JS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Sep; 56(9):1053-61. PubMed ID: 23929014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy: cost and clinical outcomes.
Davis BR; Yoo AC; Moore M; Gunnarsson C
JSLS; 2014; 18(2):211-24. PubMed ID: 24960484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Colectomy performance improvement within NSQIP 2005-2008.
Ozhathil DK; Li Y; Smith JK; Witkowski E; Coyne ER; Alavi K; Tseng JF; Shah SA
J Surg Res; 2011 Nov; 171(1):e9-13. PubMed ID: 21872886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
