217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27146262)
1. Street lighting: sex-independent impacts on moth movement.
Degen T; Mitesser O; Perkin EK; Weiß NS; Oehlert M; Mattig E; Hölker F
J Anim Ecol; 2016 Sep; 85(5):1352-60. PubMed ID: 27146262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The dark side of street lighting: impacts on moths and evidence for the disruption of nocturnal pollen transport.
Macgregor CJ; Evans DM; Fox R; Pocock MJ
Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Feb; 23(2):697-707. PubMed ID: 27251575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shedding light on moths: shorter wavelengths attract noctuids more than geometrids.
Somers-Yeates R; Hodgson D; McGregor PK; Spalding A; Ffrench-Constant RH
Biol Lett; 2013 Aug; 9(4):20130376. PubMed ID: 23720524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Declines in moth populations stress the need for conserving dark nights.
van Langevelde F; Braamburg-Annegarn M; Huigens ME; Groendijk R; Poitevin O; van Deijk JR; Ellis WN; van Grunsven RHA; de Vos R; Vos RA; Franzén M; WallisDeVries MF
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Mar; 24(3):925-932. PubMed ID: 29215778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduced flight-to-light behaviour of moth populations exposed to long-term urban light pollution.
Altermatt F; Ebert D
Biol Lett; 2016 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 27072407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sex-biased response in activity to light sources with different spectral composition in geometrid moths with flightless females (Lepidoptera: Geometridae).
Kadlec T; Pikner M; Piknerova G
Bull Entomol Res; 2016 Oct; 106(5):581-90. PubMed ID: 27121274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (part 2): Case studies.
Miller JR; Gut LJ; de Lame FM; Stelinski LL
J Chem Ecol; 2006 Oct; 32(10):2115-43. PubMed ID: 17019622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Light-emitting diode street lights reduce last-ditch evasive manoeuvres by moths to bat echolocation calls.
Wakefield A; Stone EL; Jones G; Harris S
R Soc Open Sci; 2015 Aug; 2(8):150291. PubMed ID: 26361558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated moth flight analysis in the vicinity of artificial light.
Gaydecki P
Bull Entomol Res; 2019 Feb; 109(1):127-140. PubMed ID: 29745349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tuning the white light spectrum of light emitting diode lamps to reduce attraction of nocturnal arthropods.
Longcore T; Aldern HL; Eggers JF; Flores S; Franco L; Hirshfield-Yamanishi E; Petrinec LN; Yan WA; Barroso AM
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 May; 370(1667):. PubMed ID: 25780237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial night lighting inhibits feeding in moths.
van Langevelde F; van Grunsven RH; Veenendaal EM; Fijen TP
Biol Lett; 2017 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 28250209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct and Ambient Light Pollution Alters Recruitment for a Diurnal Plant-Pollinator System.
Wilson AA; Seymoure BM; Jaeger S; Milstead B; Payne H; Peria L; Vosbigian RA; Francis CD
Integr Comp Biol; 2021 Oct; 61(3):1122-1133. PubMed ID: 33724371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Potential role of lysine succinylation in the response of moths to artificial light at night stress.
Huang Z; He L; Sang W; Wang L; Huang Q; Lei C
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Sep; 220():112334. PubMed ID: 34020284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial night lighting affects dawn song, extra-pair siring success, and lay date in songbirds.
Kempenaers B; Borgström P; Loës P; Schlicht E; Valcu M
Curr Biol; 2010 Oct; 20(19):1735-9. PubMed ID: 20850324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phototaxis of Grapholitha molesta (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) to Different Light Sources.
Sun YX; Tian A; Zhang XB; Zhao ZG; Zhang ZW; Ma RY
J Econ Entomol; 2014 Oct; 107(5):1792-9. PubMed ID: 26309269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monitoring grape berry moth (Paralobesia viteana: Lepidoptera) in commercial vineyards using a host plant based synthetic lure.
Loeb GM; Cha DH; Hesler SP; Linn CE; Zhang A; Teal PE; Roelofs WL
Environ Entomol; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1511-22. PubMed ID: 22217768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Light pollution impairs urban nocturnal pollinators but less so in areas with high tree cover.
Straka TM; von der Lippe M; Voigt CC; Gandy M; Kowarik I; Buchholz S
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jul; 778():146244. PubMed ID: 33714820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colors of attraction: Modeling insect flight to light behavior.
Donners M; van Grunsven RHA; Groenendijk D; van Langevelde F; Bikker JW; Longcore T; Veenendaal E
J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol; 2018 Oct; 329(8-9):434-440. PubMed ID: 29944198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Field Attraction of Carob Moth to Host Plants and Conspecific Females.
Hosseini SA; Goldansaz SH; Menken SBJ; van Wijk M; Roessingh P; Groot AT
J Econ Entomol; 2017 Oct; 110(5):2076-2083. PubMed ID: 28961988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
