252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27146289)
1. Characteristics of a volume-adjustable compression chamber for transradial prosthetic interface.
Sang Y; Li X; Luo Y
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jul; 230(7):650-60. PubMed ID: 27146289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical design considerations for transradial prosthetic interface: A review.
Sang Y; Li X; Luo Y
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Mar; 230(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 26759485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design of lower limb prosthetic sockets: a review.
Wang M; Nong Q; Liu Y; Yu H
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Jan; 19(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 34932435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research.
Al-Fakih EA; Abu Osman NA; Mahmad Adikan FR
Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jul; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 27447646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. State-of-the-art research in lower-limb prosthetic biomechanics-socket interface: a review.
Mak AF; Zhang M; Boone DA
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(2):161-74. PubMed ID: 11392649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume.
Klute GK; Berge JS; Biggs W; Pongnumkul S; Popovic Z; Curless B
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1570-5. PubMed ID: 21963124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjustable prosthetic sockets: a systematic review of industrial and research design characteristics and their justifications.
Baldock M; Pickard N; Prince M; Kirkwood S; Chadwell A; Howard D; Dickinson A; Kenney L; Gill N; Curtin S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2023 Nov; 20(1):147. PubMed ID: 37926807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of transhumeral socket designs utilizing patient assessment and in vivo skeletal and socket motion tracking: a case study.
Resnik L; Patel T; Cooney SG; Crisco JJ; Fantini C
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(5):423-32. PubMed ID: 25425411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finite element analysis of the contact interface between trans-femoral stump and prosthetic socket.
Zhang L; Zhu M; Shen L; Zheng F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1270-3. PubMed ID: 24109926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the new, patient-adjustable socket system Varos in the early phase of prosthetic rehabilitation: a pilot study.
Nia A; Toetschinger G; Kubinec T; Domayer S
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2022 Jun; 58(3):462-469. PubMed ID: 35148042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a residuum/socket interface simulator for lower limb prosthetics.
McGrath MP; Gao J; Tang J; Laszczak P; Jiang L; Bader D; Moser D; Zahedi S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Mar; 231(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 28164748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of an adjustable electrode housing unit to compare electrode alignment and contact variation with myoelectric prosthesis functionality: A pilot study.
Head JS; Howard D; Hutchins SW; Kenney L; Heath GH; Aksenov AY
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 25134531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjustable sockets may improve residual limb fluid volume retention in transtibial prosthesis users.
Brzostowski JT; Larsen BG; Youngblood RT; Ciol MA; Hafner BJ; Gurrey CJ; McLean JB; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Jun; 43(3):250-256. PubMed ID: 30628522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marker-based method to measure movement between the residual limb and a transtibial prosthetic socket.
Childers WL; Siebert S
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Dec; 40(6):720-728. PubMed ID: 26527758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between socket pressure and EMG of two muscles in trans-femoral stumps during gait.
Hong JH; Mun MS
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16180378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attachment of upper arm prostheses with a subcutaneous osseointegrated implant in transhumeral amputees.
Salminger S; Gradischar A; Skiera R; Roche AD; Sturma A; Hofer C; Aszmann OC
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 27638013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fluctuating residual limb volume accommodated with an adjustable, modular socket design: A novel case report.
Mitton K; Kulkarni J; Dunn KW; Ung AH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):527-531. PubMed ID: 27888261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods for characterization of mechanical and electrical prosthetic vacuum pumps.
Komolafe O; Wood S; Caldwell R; Hansen A; Fatone S
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(8):1069-78. PubMed ID: 24458892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An anthropomorphic transhumeral prosthesis socket developed based on an oscillometric pump and controlled by force-sensitive resistor pressure signals.
Razak NA; Gholizadeh H; Hasnan N; Osman NA; Fadzil SS; Hashim NA
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 Feb; 62(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 27166714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
