357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27146401)
1. Premature responding is associated with approach to a food cue in male and female heterogeneous stock rats.
King CP; Palmer AA; Woods LC; Hawk LW; Richards JB; Meyer PJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Jul; 233(13):2593-605. PubMed ID: 27146401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Individual differences in food cue responsivity are associated with acute and repeated cocaine-induced vocalizations, but not cue-induced vocalizations.
Tripi JA; Dent ML; Meyer PJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Feb; 234(3):437-446. PubMed ID: 27837333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The tendency to sign-track predicts cue-induced reinstatement during nicotine self-administration, and is enhanced by nicotine but not ethanol.
Versaggi CL; King CP; Meyer PJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Aug; 233(15-16):2985-97. PubMed ID: 27282365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lesions of the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus differentially affect sign- and goal-tracking conditioned responses.
Haight JL; Fraser KM; Akil H; Flagel SB
Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 42(7):2478-88. PubMed ID: 26228683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Examining the role of dopamine D2 and D3 receptors in Pavlovian conditioned approach behaviors.
Fraser KM; Haight JL; Gardner EL; Flagel SB
Behav Brain Res; 2016 May; 305():87-99. PubMed ID: 26909847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conditioned approach behavior of SHR and SD rats during Pavlovian conditioning.
Silic B; Aggarwal M; Liyanagama K; Tripp G; Wickens JR
Behav Brain Res; 2023 Apr; 443():114348. PubMed ID: 36796486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic Encoding of Incentive Salience in the Ventral Pallidum: Dependence on the Form of the Reward Cue.
Ahrens AM; Ferguson LM; Robinson TE; Aldridge JW
eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29740595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lesions of the ventral hippocampus attenuate the acquisition but not expression of sign-tracking behavior in rats.
Fitzpatrick CJ; Creeden JF; Perrine SA; Morrow JD
Hippocampus; 2016 Nov; 26(11):1424-1434. PubMed ID: 27438780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inadequate early social experience increases the incentive salience of reward-related cues in adulthood.
Lomanowska AM; Lovic V; Rankine MJ; Mooney SJ; Robinson TE; Kraemer GW
Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 220(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 21277909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The lateral hypothalamus and orexinergic transmission in the paraventricular thalamus promote the attribution of incentive salience to reward-associated cues.
Haight JL; Campus P; Maria-Rios CE; Johnson AM; Klumpner MS; Kuhn BN; Covelo IR; Morrow JD; Flagel SB
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2020 Dec; 237(12):3741-3758. PubMed ID: 32852601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sign-tracking predicts increased choice of cocaine over food in rats.
Tunstall BJ; Kearns DN
Behav Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 281():222-8. PubMed ID: 25541036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which cue to 'want'? Opioid stimulation of central amygdala makes goal-trackers show stronger goal-tracking, just as sign-trackers show stronger sign-tracking.
DiFeliceantonio AG; Berridge KC
Behav Brain Res; 2012 May; 230(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 22391118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adrenergic manipulation inhibits pavlovian conditioned approach behaviors.
Pasquariello KZ; Han M; Unal C; Meyer PJ
Behav Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 339():278-285. PubMed ID: 29128392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to a reward-related cue: influence on cocaine sensitization.
Flagel SB; Watson SJ; Akil H; Robinson TE
Behav Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 186(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 17719099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cannabinoid receptor-1 signaling contributions to sign-tracking and conditioned reinforcement in rats.
Bacharach SZ; Nasser HM; Zlebnik NE; Dantrassy HM; Kochli DE; Gyawali U; Cheer JF; Calu DJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Oct; 235(10):3031-3043. PubMed ID: 30109373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to a food cue: influence of sex.
Pitchers KK; Flagel SB; O'Donnell EG; Woods LC; Sarter M; Robinson TE
Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():462-9. PubMed ID: 25446811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of subthalamic nucleus lesions on sign-tracking to stimuli paired with food and drug rewards: facilitation of incentive salience attribution?
Uslaner JM; Dell'Orco JM; Pevzner A; Robinson TE
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2008 Sep; 33(10):2352-61. PubMed ID: 18059435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inhibition of Dopamine Neurons Prevents Incentive Value Encoding of a Reward Cue: With Revelations from Deep Phenotyping.
Iglesias AG; Chiu AS; Wong J; Campus P; Li F; Liu ZN; Bhatti JK; Patel SA; Deisseroth K; Akil H; Burgess CR; Flagel SB
J Neurosci; 2023 Nov; 43(44):7376-7392. PubMed ID: 37709540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rats that sign-track are resistant to Pavlovian but not instrumental extinction.
Ahrens AM; Singer BF; Fitzpatrick CJ; Morrow JD; Robinson TE
Behav Brain Res; 2016 Jan; 296():418-430. PubMed ID: 26235331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats.
Flagel SB; Watson SJ; Robinson TE; Akil H
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Apr; 191(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 16972103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
