280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27146518)
1. Developing an assessment approach for perceptual changes to tinnitus sound characteristics for adult cochlear implant recipients.
Greenberg D; Meerton L; Graham J; Vickers D
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):392-404. PubMed ID: 27146518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cochlear implant effectiveness in postlingual single-sided deaf individuals: what's the point?
Finke M; Bönitz H; Lyxell B; Illg A
Int J Audiol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):417-423. PubMed ID: 28635507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Music appreciation and music listening in prelingual and postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant recipients.
Moran M; Rousset A; Looi V
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S57-63. PubMed ID: 27045837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for postlingually deafened adults.
Leigh JR; Moran M; Hollow R; Dowell RC
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S3-8. PubMed ID: 26963131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Referral rates of postlingually deafened adult hearing aid users for a cochlear implant candidacy assessment.
Looi V; Bluett C; Boisvert I
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):919-925. PubMed ID: 28678547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of health-related quality of life in adult cochlear implant recipients in South Africa.
le Roux T; Vinck B; Butler I; Louw L; Nauta L; Schlesinger D; Swanepoel W
Int J Audiol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 27609548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial hearing in a child with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and bilateral cochlear implants.
Johnstone PM; Yeager KR; Noss E
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):400-8. PubMed ID: 23586418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A
Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brief Assessment of Parental Perception (BAPP): Development and validation of a new measure for assessing paediatric outcomes after bilateral cochlear implantation.
Samuel V; Gamble C; Cullington H; Bathgate F; Bennett E; Coop N; Cropper J; Emond A; Kentish R; Edwards L
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):699-705. PubMed ID: 27434545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interaction of tinnitus suppression and hearing ability after cochlear implantation.
Wang Q; Li JN; Lei GX; Chen DS; Wang WZ; Chen AT; Mong MD; Li S; Jiao QS; Yang SM
Acta Otolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 137(10):1077-1082. PubMed ID: 28641038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users.
Mathew R; Undurraga J; Li G; Meerton L; Boyle P; Shaida A; Selvadurai D; Jiang D; Vickers D
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():86-101. PubMed ID: 28826636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of unilateral multichannel cochlear implant on bilaterally perceived tinnitus.
Quaranta N; Fernandez-Vega S; D'elia C; Filipo R; Quaranta A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Feb; 128(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 17851950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-Reported Usage, Functional Benefit, and Audiologic Characteristics of Cochlear Implant Patients Who Use a Contralateral Hearing Aid.
Neuman AC; Waltzman SB; Shapiro WH; Neukam JD; Zeman AM; Svirsky MA
Trends Hear; 2017 Jan; 21():2331216517699530. PubMed ID: 28351216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; van Dijk B; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Categorisation of natural sounds at different stages of auditory recovery in cochlear implant adult deaf patients.
Strelnikov K; Collett E; Gaillard P; Truy E; Déguine O; Marx M; Barone P
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():182-194. PubMed ID: 29914727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor.
Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J
Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual Differences Between Low-Frequency Analog and Pulsatile Stimulation as Shown by Single- and Multidimensional Scaling.
Stupak N; Padilla M; Morse RP; Landsberger DM
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518807535. PubMed ID: 30378468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Improvement in tinnitus distress, health-related quality of life and psychological comorbidities by cochlear implantation in single-sided deaf patients. German version].
Häußler SM; Knopke S; Dudka S; Gräbel S; Ketterer MC; Battmer RD; Ernst A; Olze H
HNO; 2019 Nov; 67(11):863-873. PubMed ID: 31384969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The case for earlier cochlear implantation in postlingually deaf adults.
Dowell RC
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S51-6. PubMed ID: 26918896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
