BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27147325)

  • 1. Proton and light ion RBE for the induction of direct DNA double strand breaks.
    Pater P; Bäckstöm G; Villegas F; Ahnesjö A; Enger SA; Seuntjens J; El Naqa I
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2131. PubMed ID: 27147325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid MCNP simulation of DNA double strand break (DSB) relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for photons, neutrons, and light ions.
    Stewart RD; Streitmatter SW; Argento DC; Kirkby C; Goorley JT; Moffitt G; Jevremovic T; Sandison GA
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):8249-74. PubMed ID: 26449929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the consistency of Monte Carlo track structure DNA damage simulations.
    Pater P; Seuntjens J; El Naqa I; Bernal MA
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121708. PubMed ID: 25471955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of radiation quality and oxygen on clustered DNA lesions and cell death.
    Stewart RD; Yu VK; Georgakilas AG; Koumenis C; Park JH; Carlson DJ
    Radiat Res; 2011 Nov; 176(5):587-602. PubMed ID: 21823972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integration of Monte Carlo simulations with PFGE experimental data yields constant RBE of 2.3 for DNA double-strand break induction by nitrogen ions between 125 and 225 keV/μm LET.
    Alloni D; Campa A; Friedland W; Mariotti L; Ottolenghi A
    Radiat Res; 2013 Jun; 179(6):690-7. PubMed ID: 23647004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of indirect actions and oxygen on relative biological effectiveness: estimate of DSB inductions and conversions induced by therapeutic proton beams.
    Luo WR; Chen FH; Huang RJ; Chen YP; Hsiao YY
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2020 Feb; 96(2):187-196. PubMed ID: 31682784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sub-micrometer 20MeV protons or 45MeV lithium spot irradiation enhances yields of dicentric chromosomes due to clustering of DNA double-strand breaks.
    Schmid TE; Friedland W; Greubel C; Girst S; Reindl J; Siebenwirth C; Ilicic K; Schmid E; Multhoff G; Schmitt E; Kundrát P; Dollinger G
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2015 Nov; 793():30-40. PubMed ID: 26520370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo simulations of therapeutic proton beams for relative biological effectiveness of double-strand break.
    Wang CC; Hsiao Y; Lee CC; Chao TC; Wang CC; Tung CJ
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan; 88(1-2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21823821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of DNA double-strand breaks: a Monte Carlo simulation of the end-structure of strand breaks produced by protons and alpha particles.
    Ottolenghi A; Merzagora M; Tallone L; Durante M; Paretzke HG; Wilson WE
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 1995 Nov; 34(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 8749062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A mechanism-based approach to predict the relative biological effectiveness of protons and carbon ions in radiation therapy.
    Frese MC; Yu VK; Stewart RD; Carlson DJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May; 83(1):442-50. PubMed ID: 22099045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulation of DSB yield for high LET radiation.
    Friedrich T; Durante M; Scholz M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Sep; 166(1-4):61-5. PubMed ID: 25883306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. LET dependence of the yield of single-, double-strand breaks and base lesions in fully hydrated plasmid DNA films by 4He(2+) ion irradiation.
    Urushibara A; Shikazono N; O'Neill P; Fujii K; Wada S; Yokoya A
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2008 Jan; 84(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 17852554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spectrum of Radiation-Induced Clustered Non-DSB Damage - A Monte Carlo Track Structure Modeling and Calculations.
    Watanabe R; Rahmanian S; Nikjoo H
    Radiat Res; 2015 May; 183(5):525-40. PubMed ID: 25909147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A cell-by-cell Monte Carlo simulation for assessing radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks.
    Lee BH; Wang CC
    Phys Med; 2019 Jun; 62():140-151. PubMed ID: 31153394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The invariance of the total direct DNA strand break yield.
    Bernal MA; deAlmeida CE; Sampaio C; Incerti S; Champion C; Nieminen P
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4147-53. PubMed ID: 21859016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DNA double-strand breaks in cancer cells as a function of proton linear energy transfer and its variation in time.
    Keta O; Petković V; Cirrone P; Petringa G; Cuttone G; Sakata D; Shin WG; Incerti S; Petrović I; Ristić Fira A
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2021; 97(9):1229-1240. PubMed ID: 34187289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo Simulation of the Oxygen Effect in DNA Damage Induction by Ionizing Radiation.
    Forster JC; Douglass MJJ; Phillips WM; Bezak E
    Radiat Res; 2018 Sep; 190(3):248-261. PubMed ID: 29953346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MODELLING DSB REPAIR KINETICS FOR DNA DAMAGE INDUCED BY PROTON AND CARBON IONS.
    Taleei R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 May; 183(1-2):75-78. PubMed ID: 30668809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage induction by x-rays and selected radioisotopes.
    Hsiao Y; Stewart RD
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):233-44. PubMed ID: 18182699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A nanodosimetric model of radiation-induced clustered DNA damage yields.
    Garty G; Schulte R; Shchemelinin S; Leloup C; Assaf G; Breskin A; Chechik R; Bashkirov V; Milligan J; Grosswendt B
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):761-81. PubMed ID: 20071772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.