233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27147338)
1. Performance evaluation of a high resolution dedicated breast PET scanner.
García Hernández T; Vicedo González A; Ferrer Rebolleda J; Sánchez Jurado R; Roselló Ferrando J; Brualla González L; Granero Cabañero D; Del Puig Cozar Santiago M
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2261. PubMed ID: 27147338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of dedicated breast positron emission tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography images: a common phantom study.
Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 31768819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Higher breast cancer conspicuity on dbPET compared to WB-PET/CT.
Nishimatsu K; Nakamoto Y; Miyake KK; Ishimori T; Kanao S; Toi M; Togashi K
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():138-145. PubMed ID: 28583624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and evaluation of the MAMMI dedicated breast PET.
Moliner L; Gonzalez AJ; Soriano A; Sanchez F; Correcher C; Orero A; Carles M; Vidal LF; Barbera J; Caballero L; Seimetz M; Vazquez C; Benlloch JM
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5393-404. PubMed ID: 22957607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance characteristics of a new 3-dimensional continuous-emission and spiral-transmission high-sensitivity and high-resolution PET camera evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Mizuta T; Tanaka K; Yamamoto S; Sakamoto S; Nakamoto Y; Amano M; Murase K; Senda M
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 16391191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance Evaluation of a New Dedicated Breast PET Scanner Using NEMA NU4-2008 Standards.
Miyake KK; Matsumoto K; Inoue M; Nakamoto Y; Kanao S; Oishi T; Kawase S; Kitamura K; Yamakawa Y; Akazawa A; Kobayashi T; Ohi J; Togashi K
J Nucl Med; 2014 Jul; 55(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 24812244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner: Numerical observer study of lesion detection.
Raylman RR; Stolin A; Hays S; Johnson E; Lankas S; Mekonnen M; Roemer K
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7489-7496. PubMed ID: 36219487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study.
Bettinardi V; Mancosu P; Danna M; Giovacchini G; Landoni C; Picchio M; Gilardi MC; Savi A; Castiglioni I; Lecchi M; Fazio F
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Sep; 51(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 17464266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of radioactivity outside the field of view on image quality of dedicated breast positron emission tomography: preliminary phantom and clinical studies.
Satoh Y; Imai M; Ikegawa C; Hirata K; Abo N; Kusuzaki M; Oyama-Manabe N; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Dec; 36(12):1010-1018. PubMed ID: 36207497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.
Surti S; Kuhn A; Werner ME; Perkins AE; Kolthammer J; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 48(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 17332626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Optimization of basic adjustable data-acquisition parameters for continuous three-dimensional whole-body FDG-PET].
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Mizuta T; Shimizu K; Murase K; Senda M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jan; 62(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16456508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of image quality at the detector's edge of dedicated breast positron emission tomography.
Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Omiya Y; Onishi H
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Jan; 8(1):5. PubMed ID: 33462645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of PET image reconstruction using a spatial resolution model.
Andersen FL; Klausen TL; Loft A; Beyer T; Holm S
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):862-9. PubMed ID: 23254158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET.
El Fakhri G; Santos PA; Badawi RD; Holdsworth CH; Van Den Abbeele AD; Kijewski MF
J Nucl Med; 2007 Dec; 48(12):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18006613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Head and neck cancer: dedicated FDG PET/CT protocol for detection--phantom and initial clinical studies.
Yamamoto Y; Wong TZ; Turkington TG; Hawk TC; Coleman RE
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):263-72. PubMed ID: 17495174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal relaxation parameters of dynamic row-action maximum likelihood algorithm and post-smoothing filter for image reconstruction of dedicated breast PET.
Satoh Y; Imai M; Hirata K; Asakawa Y; Ikegawa C; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 May; 35(5):608-616. PubMed ID: 33772738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Static and moving phantom studies for radiation treatment planning in a positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) system.
Okubo M; Nishimura Y; Nakamatsu K; Okumura M; Shibata T; Kanamori S; Hanaoka K; Hosono M
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 22(7):579-86. PubMed ID: 18756360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two commercial whole body PET systems based on LSO and BGO crystals respectively for brain imaging.
Trébossen R; Comtat C; Brulon V; Bailly P; Meyer ME
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1399-409. PubMed ID: 19472647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Prototype High-Resolution Small-Animal PET Scanner Dedicated to Mouse Brain Imaging.
Yang Y; Bec J; Zhou J; Zhang M; Judenhofer MS; Bai X; Di K; Wu Y; Rodriguez M; Dokhale P; Shah KS; Farrell R; Qi J; Cherry SR
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1130-5. PubMed ID: 27013696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
