150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27147338)
41. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time.
Brown C; Dempsey MF; Gillen G; Elliott AT
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Mar; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 20032801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Initial experience of integrated PET/MR mammography in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kong EJ; Chun KA; Bom HS; Lee J; Lee SJ; Cho IH
Hell J Nucl Med; 2014; 17(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 25397622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. ALBIRA: a small animal PET∕SPECT∕CT imaging system.
Sánchez F; Orero A; Soriano A; Correcher C; Conde P; González A; Hernández L; Moliner L; Rodríguez-Alvarez MJ; Vidal LF; Benlloch JM; Chapman SE; Leevy WM
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051906. PubMed ID: 23635276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Design study of a high-resolution breast-dedicated PET system built from cadmium zinc telluride detectors.
Peng H; Levin CS
Phys Med Biol; 2010 May; 55(9):2761-88. PubMed ID: 20400807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Impact of Time-of-Flight PET/CT with a Large Axial Field of View for Reducing Whole-Body Acquisition Time.
Akamatsu G; Uba K; Taniguchi T; Mitsumoto K; Narisue A; Tsutsui Y; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2014 Jun; 42(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 24799607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Study of the performance of a novel 1 mm resolution dual-panel PET camera design dedicated to breast cancer imaging using Monte Carlo simulation.
Zhang J; Olcott PD; Chinn G; Foudray AM; Levine CS
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):689-702. PubMed ID: 17388187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Three-dimensional imaging characteristics of the HEAD PENN-PET scanner.
Karp JS; Freifelder R; Geagan MJ; Muehllehner G; Kinahan PE; Lewitt RM; Shao L
J Nucl Med; 1997 Apr; 38(4):636-43. PubMed ID: 9098216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. NEMA NU 2-2001 performance measurements of an LYSO-based PET/CT system in 2D and 3D acquisition modes.
Kemp BJ; Kim C; Williams JJ; Ganin A; Lowe VJ;
J Nucl Med; 2006 Dec; 47(12):1960-7. PubMed ID: 17138738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. First clinical experience with a dedicated PET for hanging breast molecular imaging.
Koolen BB; Aukema TS; González Martínez AJ; Vogel WV; Caballero Ontanaya L; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Vroonland CJ; Rutgers EJ; Benlloch Baviera JM; Valdés Olmos RA
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Mar; 57(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 23474637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Mammotomography with pinhole incomplete circular orbit SPECT.
Tornai MP; Bowsher JE; Jaszczak RJ; Pieper BC; Greer KL; Hardenbergh PH; Coleman RE
J Nucl Med; 2003 Apr; 44(4):583-93. PubMed ID: 12679403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Accurate Monte Carlo modeling and performance assessment of the X-PET subsystem of the FLEX triumph preclinical PET/CT scanner.
Zeraatkar N; Ay MR; Kamali-Asl AR; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1217-25. PubMed ID: 21520834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Small animal PET scanner based on monolithic LYSO crystals: performance evaluation.
Sanchez F; Moliner L; Correcher C; Gonzalez A; Orero A; Carles M; Soriano A; Rodriguez-Alvarez MJ; Medina LA; Mora F; Benlloch JM
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):643-53. PubMed ID: 22320773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Influence of detector pixel size, TOF resolution and DOI on image quality in MR-compatible whole-body PET.
Thoen H; Keereman V; Mollet P; Van Holen R; Vandenberghe S
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6459-79. PubMed ID: 24002358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography.
Black QC; Grills IS; Kestin LL; Wong CY; Wong JW; Martinez AA; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1272-82. PubMed ID: 15519800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. FDG PET and dual-head gamma camera positron coincidence detection imaging of suspected malignancies and brain disorders.
Delbeke D; Patton JA; Martin WH; Sandler MP
J Nucl Med; 1999 Jan; 40(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 9935066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Performance characteristics of a newly developed PET/CT scanner using NEMA standards in 2D and 3D modes.
Mawlawi O; Podoloff DA; Kohlmyer S; Williams JJ; Stearns CW; Culp RF; Macapinlac H;
J Nucl Med; 2004 Oct; 45(10):1734-42. PubMed ID: 15471842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Development of small-animal PET prototype using silicon photomultiplier (SiPM): initial results of phantom and animal imaging studies.
Kwon SI; Lee JS; Yoon HS; Ito M; Ko GB; Choi JY; Lee SH; Chan Song I; Jeong JM; Lee DS; Hong SJ
J Nucl Med; 2011 Apr; 52(4):572-9. PubMed ID: 21421723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of optimal acquisition duration or injected activity for pediatric 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Alessio AM; Sammer M; Phillips GS; Manchanda V; Mohr BC; Parisi MT
J Nucl Med; 2011 Jul; 52(7):1028-34. PubMed ID: 21680684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Initial characterization of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner during human imaging.
Bowen SL; Wu Y; Chaudhari AJ; Fu L; Packard NJ; Burkett GW; Yang K; Lindfors KK; Shelton DK; Hagge R; Borowsky AD; Martinez SR; Qi J; Boone JM; Cherry SR; Badawi RD
J Nucl Med; 2009 Sep; 50(9):1401-8. PubMed ID: 19690029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Quantification with a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner.
Bowen SL; Ferrero A; Badawi RD
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2694-707. PubMed ID: 22559640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
