259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27147365)
1. On the meaning of the weighted alternative free-response operating characteristic figure of merit.
Chakraborty DP; Zhai X
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2548. PubMed ID: 27147365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A JAFROC study of nodule detection performance in CT images of a thorax acquired during PET/CT.
Thompson JD; Wareing A; Szczepura KR; Vinjamuri S; Hogg P
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):191-196. PubMed ID: 28687285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ideal AFROC and FROC observers.
Khurd P; Liu B; Gindi G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 20129845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of threshold-bias independent analysis to eye-tracking and FROC data.
Chakraborty DP; Yoon HJ; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1474-83. PubMed ID: 23040503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.
Zanca F; Hillis SL; Claus F; Van Ongeval C; Celis V; Provoost V; Yoon HJ; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5917-29. PubMed ID: 23039631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.
Chakraborty DP; Winter LH
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):873-81. PubMed ID: 2305073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonparametric signal detectability evaluation using an exponential transformation of the FROC curve.
Popescu LM
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5690-702. PubMed ID: 21992384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maximum likelihood fitting of FROC curves under an initial-detection-and-candidate-analysis model.
Edwards DC; Kupinski MA; Metz CE; Nishikawa RM
Med Phys; 2002 Dec; 29(12):2861-70. PubMed ID: 12512721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical power in observer-performance studies: comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and free-response methods in tasks involving localization.
Chakraborty D
Acad Radiol; 2002 Feb; 9(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 11918367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of compressed breast thickness and dose on lesion detectability in digital mammography: FROC study with simulated lesions in real mammograms.
Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Van Ongeval C; Van Steen A; Michielsen K; Cockmartin L; Struelens L; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5104. PubMed ID: 27587041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility as a rationale for choosing observer performance assessment paradigms for detection tasks in medical imaging.
Wunderlich A; Abbey CK
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111903. PubMed ID: 24320436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Operating characteristics predicted by models for diagnostic tasks involving lesion localization.
Chakraborty DP; Yoon HJ
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 18383663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microcalcification detectability using a bench-top prototype photon-counting breast CT based on a Si strip detector.
Cho HM; Ding H; Barber WC; Iwanczyk JS; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4401-10. PubMed ID: 26133636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of hazard prediction ability at hazard prediction training (Kiken-Yochi Training: KYT) by free-response receiver-operating characteristic (FROC) analysis.
Hashida M; Kamezaki R; Goto M; Shiraishi J
Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Mar; 10(1):106-112. PubMed ID: 27787667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.
Chakraborty DP; Berbaum KS
Med Phys; 2004 Aug; 31(8):2313-30. PubMed ID: 15377098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New CR system with pixel size of 50 microm for digital mammography: physical imaging properties and detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Ideguchi T; Higashida Y; Kawaji Y; Sasaki M; Zaizen M; Shibayama R; Nakamura Y; Koyanagi K; Ikeda H; Ohki M; Toyofuku F; Muranaka T
Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 15468941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The validity of three-class Hotelling trace (3-HT) in describing three-class task performance: comparison of three-class volume under ROC surface (VUS) and 3-HT.
He X; Frey EC
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Feb; 28(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 19188107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
