245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27147688)
21. Predicting osteoporosis from kidney-ureter-bladder radiographs utilizing deep convolutional neural networks.
Yen TY; Ho CS; Pei YC; Fan TY; Chang SY; Kuo CF; Chen YP
Bone; 2024 Jul; 184():117107. PubMed ID: 38677502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative assessment of bone mineral measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography.
Formica CA; Nieves JW; Cosman F; Garrett P; Lindsay R
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 9850355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cortical and Trabecular Bone Analysis of Patients With High Bone Mass From the Barcelona Osteoporosis Cohort Using 3-Dimensional Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry: A Case-Control Study.
Orduna G; Humbert L; Fonolla R; Romera J; Cos ML; Rial A; Nogués X; Diez-Perez A; Mellibovsky L
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(4):480-484. PubMed ID: 28648836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis of the evolution of cortical and trabecular bone compartments in the proximal femur after spinal cord injury by 3D-DXA.
Gifre L; Humbert L; Muxi A; Del Rio L; Vidal J; Portell E; Monegal A; Guañabens N; Peris P
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Jan; 29(1):201-209. PubMed ID: 29043391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sources of variability in bone mineral density measurements: implications for study design and analysis of bone loss.
Nguyen TV; Sambrook PN; Eisman JA
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9240735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Discordantly high spinal bone mineral density values in patients with adult lumbar scoliosis.
Pappou IP; Girardi FP; Sandhu HS; Parvataneni HK; Cammisa FP; Schneider R; Frelinghuysen P; Lane JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jun; 31(14):1614-20. PubMed ID: 16778698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mandibular bone mineral density as a predictor of skeletal osteoporosis.
Horner K; Devlin H; Alsop CW; Hodgkinson IM; Adams JE
Br J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 69(827):1019-25. PubMed ID: 8958019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Osteoporosis and anterior femoral notching in periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: a biomechanical analysis.
Shawen SB; Belmont PJ; Klemme WR; Topoleski LD; Xenos JS; Orchowski JR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jan; 85(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 12533581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Simple Assessment of Global Bone Density and Osteoporosis Screening Using Standard Radiographs of the Hand.
Schreiber JJ; Kamal RN; Yao J
J Hand Surg Am; 2017 Apr; 42(4):244-249. PubMed ID: 28242242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause.
Pouillès JM; Tremollières FA; Martinez S; Delsol M; Ribot C
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11305086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correlation of plain radiographic indices of the hip with quantitative bone mineral density.
Sah AP; Thornhill TS; LeBoff MS; Glowacki J
Osteoporos Int; 2007 Aug; 18(8):1119-26. PubMed ID: 17340218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Positive correlation between the proximal femur Hounsfield units from routine CT and DXA results.
Ye K; Xing Y; Zou D; Zhou F; Zhang Z; Du G; Tian Y
J Orthop Res; 2023 Dec; 41(12):2648-2656. PubMed ID: 37211875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The ability of peripheral quantitative ultrasound to identify patients with low bone mineral density in the hip or spine.
Cook RB; Collins D; Tucker J; Zioupos P
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 May; 31(5):625-32. PubMed ID: 15866412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Bone density measurement: quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus and distal radius. A comparison with dual spectrum X-ray absorptiometry].
Boyanov M; Shinkov A; Nestorova R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2007 Apr; 132(16):869-73. PubMed ID: 17443442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Using Hounsfield Units to Assess Osteoporotic Status on Wrist Computed Tomography Scans: Comparison With Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Johnson CC; Gausden EB; Weiland AJ; Lane JM; Schreiber JJ
J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jul; 41(7):767-74. PubMed ID: 27189150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Speed of Sound Measures Assessed by Multisite Quantitative Ultrasound to Bone Mineral Density Measures Assessed by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Large Canadian Cohort: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).
Olszynski WP; Adachi JD; Hanley DA; Davison KS; Brown JP
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 26050876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Unilateral vs bilateral hip bone mineral density measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.
Ikegami S; Kamimura M; Uchiyama S; Mukaiyama K; Kato H
J Clin Densitom; 2014; 17(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 23683727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radiographic absorptiometry as a screening tool in male osteoporosis: results from the Odense Androgen Study.
Hansen SJ; Nielsen MM; Ryg J; Wraae K; Andersen M; Brixen K
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 19488892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Common Mistakes in the Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Turkey. A Retrospective Descriptive Multicenter Study.
Karahan AY; Kaya B; Kuran B; Altındag O; Yildirim P; Dogan SC; Basaran A; Salbas E; Altınbilek T; Guler T; Tolu S; Hasbek Z; Ordahan B; Kaydok E; Yucel U; Yesilyurt S; Polat AD; Cubukcu M; Nas O; Sarp U; Yasar O; Kucuksarac S; Turkoglu G; Karadag A; Bagcaci S; Erol K; Guler E; Tuna S; Yildirim A; Karpuz S
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 2016; 59(4):117-123. PubMed ID: 28440214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
