These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27148978)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Accuracy, Reliability, and Reproducibility of Two Different 3D Face-Scanning Systems.
    Ye H; Lv L; Liu Y; Liu Y; Zhou Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 27148978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems.
    Fourie Z; Damstra J; Gerrits PO; Ren Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Apr; 207(1-3):127-34. PubMed ID: 20951517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of measurements of facial swelling with a stereophotogrammetry optical three-dimensional scanner.
    van der Meer WJ; Dijkstra PU; Visser A; Vissink A; Ren Y
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 52(10):922-7. PubMed ID: 25219776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a three-dimensional facial scanning system based on structured light techniques.
    Ma L; Xu T; Lin J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jun; 94(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 19303659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
    Dindaroğlu F; Kutlu P; Duran GS; Görgülü S; Aslan E
    Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26267357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Rangel FA; Mollemans W; Schutyser FA; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 18539435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity and reliability of a structured-light 3D scanner and an ultrasound imaging system for measurements of facial skin thickness.
    Lee KW; Kim SH; Gil YC; Hu KS; Kim HJ
    Clin Anat; 2017 Oct; 30(7):878-886. PubMed ID: 28589650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
    Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
    Plooij JM; Swennen GR; Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Schutyser FA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 19167191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of RGB-D camera-based and stereophotogrammetric facial scanners: a comparative study.
    Pan F; Liu J; Cen Y; Chen Y; Cai R; Zhao Z; Liao W; Wang J
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104302. PubMed ID: 36152954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In a clinimetric analysis, 3D stereophotogrammetry was found to be reliable and valid for measuring scar volume in clinical research.
    Stekelenburg CM; Jaspers ME; Niessen FB; Knol DL; van der Wal MB; de Vet HC; van Zuijlen PP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 25817943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and reproducibility of a 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetric imaging system.
    de Menezes M; Rosati R; Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 68(9):2129-35. PubMed ID: 20646812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of the buccolingual inclination of teeth: manual technique vs 3-dimensional software.
    Nouri M; Abdi AH; Farzan A; Mokhtarpour F; Baghban AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 25263155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of clinical bracket point registration with 3D laser scanner and coordinate measuring machine.
    Nouri M; Farzan A; Baghban AR; Massudi R
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 25741826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a portable low-budget three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry system for nasal analysis.
    Ritschl LM; Grill FD; Mittermeier F; Lonic D; Wolff KD; Roth M; Loeffelbein DJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2008-2016. PubMed ID: 30322779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional intra-rater and inter-rater reliability during a posed smile using a video-based motion analyzing system.
    Mishima K; Umeda H; Nakano A; Shiraishi R; Hori S; Ueyama Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 23830766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a passive stereophotogrammetry system for imaging of the breast: a geometric analysis.
    Catherwood T; McCaughan E; Greer E; Spence RA; McIntosh SA; Winder RJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):900-5. PubMed ID: 21382736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system.
    Khambay B; Nairn N; Bell A; Miller J; Bowman A; Ayoub AF
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17561318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.