These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27148989)

  • 1. Comparison of Skeletal and Dental Reference Planes with the Hamulus-Incisive-Papilla Plane: A Pilot Study on 3D Reconstructed Tomographies of the Skull.
    Pittschieler E; Foltin A; Falkensammer F; Figl M; Birkfellner W; Jonke E; Bantleon HP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):274-6. PubMed ID: 27148989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of face-bow transfer for the planning of orthognathic surgery.
    Zizelmann C; Hammer B; Gellrich NC; Schwestka-Polly R; Rana M; Bucher P
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1944-50. PubMed ID: 22079061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occlusal plane orientation: a statistical and clinical analysis in different clinical situations.
    Jayachandran S; Ramachandran CR; Varghese R
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):572-5. PubMed ID: 18761577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Face-bow record without a third point of reference: theoretical considerations and an alternative technique.
    Ercoli C; Graser GN; Tallents RH; Galindo D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):237-41. PubMed ID: 10424992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The impact of occlusal plane orientation method on intercuspal occlusion estimation].
    Zhulev EN; Bogatova EA; Ershov PE; Lepakhina AA
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2013; 92(6):48-50. PubMed ID: 24429790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Otegi JR; Szentpétery A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 1 face bow.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):567-72. PubMed ID: 18462852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional analysis of the occlusal plane related to the hamular-incisive-papilla occlusal plane in young adults.
    Fu PS; Hung CC; Hong JM; Wang JC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 34(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 17244236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study between 2 methods of mounting models in semiadjustable articulator for orthognathic surgery.
    Mayrink G; Sawazaki R; Asprino L; de Moraes M; Fernandes Moreira RW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2879-82. PubMed ID: 21496992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fabrication of occlusal rims to record the maxillomandibular relation for complete dentures.
    Jayachandran S; Grey N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 24461948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Occlusal plane discrepancies generated by transverse horizontal axis deviations.
    Bowley JF; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 11458264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the performance of various virtual articulator mounting procedures: a self-controlled clinical study.
    Lin H; Pan Y; Wei X; Wang Y; Yu H; Cheng H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):4017-4028. PubMed ID: 37247089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary anatomic landmarks for greater palatine nerve block anesthesia.
    Kang SH; Byun IY; Kim JH; Park HK; Kim MK
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May; 23(3):e199-202. PubMed ID: 22627432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer System with an earbow for mounting a maxillary cast.
    Lux LH; Thompson GA; Waliszewski KJ; Ziebert GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 25979448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Occlusal errors generated at the maxillary incisal edge position related to discrepancies in the arbitrary horizontal axis location and to the thickness of the interocclusal record.
    Kois JC; Kois DE; Chaiyabutr Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 23998625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-dimensional imaging of the pterygopalatine fossa.
    Mitchell AO; Alburger JF; Bolger WE; Frew MI; Richardson AC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jun; 136(6):1014-6. PubMed ID: 17547998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
    Kim SJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Cho BH; Hwang DS
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of maxillary incisive canal characteristics related to dental implant treatment with computerized tomography: a clinical multicenter study.
    Tözüm TF; Güncü GN; Yıldırım YD; Yılmaz HG; Galindo-Moreno P; Velasco-Torres M; Al-Hezaimi K; Al-Sadhan R; Karabulut E; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2012 Mar; 83(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 21910596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.