These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27149179)

  • 1. The effect of task-relevant and irrelevant anxiety-provoking stimuli on response inhibition.
    Wilson KM; de Joux NR; Finkbeiner KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():358-365. PubMed ID: 27149179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spider stimuli improve response inhibition.
    Wilson KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 May; 33():406-13. PubMed ID: 25770464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prolonging the response movement inhibits the feed-forward motor program in the sustained attention to response task.
    Wilson KM; de Joux NR; Finkbeiner KM; Russell PN; Retzler JR; Helton WS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():75-84. PubMed ID: 29351864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conscious thought and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS; Kern RP; Walker DR
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):600-7. PubMed ID: 19589699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task.
    Finkbeiner KM; Wilson KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Apr; 233(4):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25537468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: the Sustained Attention to Response Task does not measure sustained attention.
    Dang JS; Figueroa IJ; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2255-2262. PubMed ID: 29846798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sustained attention failures are primarily due to sustained cognitive load not task monotony.
    Head J; Helton WS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():87-94. PubMed ID: 25310454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Go-stimuli proportion influences response strategy in a sustained attention to response task.
    Wilson KM; Finkbeiner KM; de Joux NR; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2989-98. PubMed ID: 27329605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual decoupling or motor decoupling?
    Head J; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):913-9. PubMed ID: 23838467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Natural scene stimuli and lapses of sustained attention.
    Head J; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Dec; 21(4):1617-25. PubMed ID: 23000831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Friendly Fire and the Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    Wilson KM; Head J; de Joux NR; Finkbeiner KM; Helton WS
    Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1219-34. PubMed ID: 26408648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition.
    Carter L; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 23501702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART).
    Helton WS; Weil L; Middlemiss A; Sawers A
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 20138552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A study of sensitivity of the sustained attention to response task in patients with schizophrenia.
    Chan RC; Chen EY; Cheung EF; Chen RY; Cheung HK
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Feb; 18(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 15595363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliable- and unreliable-warning cues in the Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    Helton WS; Head J; Russell PN
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 209(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 21287153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response inhibition toward alcohol-related cues using an alcohol go/no-go task in problem and non-problem drinkers.
    Kreusch F; Vilenne A; Quertemont E
    Addict Behav; 2013 Oct; 38(10):2520-8. PubMed ID: 23773960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Search asymmetry, sustained attention, and response inhibition.
    Stevenson H; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Nov; 77(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 21920656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of arousing negative and neutral picture stimuli on target detection in a vigilance task.
    Helton WS; Russell PN
    Hum Factors; 2011 Apr; 53(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 21702331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.
    Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Psychol Res; 2023 Mar; 87(2):509-518. PubMed ID: 35403969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating sustained attention ability in the elderly by using two different approaches: inhibiting ongoing behavior versus responding on rare occasions.
    Staub B; Doignon-Camus N; Bacon E; Bonnefond A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():51-7. PubMed ID: 24378237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.