These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27149289)

  • 21. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
    Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Interactive Effects of Race and Expert Testimony on Jurors' Perceptions of Recanted Confessions.
    Ewanation L; Maeder EM
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():699077. PubMed ID: 34539496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. One Country, Two Cultures: Are Hong Kong Mock Jurors "Mainlandized" by the Predominant Chinese Criminal Justice Concept of Confession?
    Hui CY; Lo TW
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2015 Sep; 59(10):1104-24. PubMed ID: 24670371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Confession and self-control: A prelude to repentance or relapse?
    Lowe ML; Haws KL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Apr; 116(4):563-581. PubMed ID: 30321047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the power of confession evidence: an experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis.
    Kassin SM; Neumann K
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Oct; 21(5):469-84. PubMed ID: 9374602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. "I Did It, But Not Like That": Effects of Factually Incorrect Confessions on Juror Judgments.
    Jones EE; Bandy AD; Palmer PG
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(4):553-570. PubMed ID: 31984096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Suspect confession of child sexual abuse to investigators.
    Lippert T; Cross TP; Jones L; Walsh W
    Child Maltreat; 2010 May; 15(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 20410024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. False confessions, expert testimony, and admissibility.
    Watson C; Weiss KJ; Pouncey C
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 20542936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How downplaying or exaggerating crime severity in a confession affects perceived guilt.
    Holt GA; Palmer MA
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(4):599-611. PubMed ID: 35558144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mock jurors' use of error rates in DNA database trawls.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Dec; 37(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 23855323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors' perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification.
    Forrest KD; Woody WD; Brady SE; Batterman KC; Stastny BJ; Bruns JA
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):342-64. PubMed ID: 22315159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):353-371. PubMed ID: 36227320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The bastard verdict and its influence on jurors.
    Curley LJ; MacLean R; Murray J; Laybourn P; Brown D
    Med Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 59(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 30501474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of accomplice witnesses and jailhouse informants on jury decision making.
    Neuschatz JS; Lawson DS; Swanner JK; Meissner CA; Neuschatz JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 17703355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The emotional child witness: effects on juror decision-making.
    Cooper A; Quas JA; Cleveland KC
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):813-28. PubMed ID: 25537438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Why suspects confess: The power of outcome certainty.
    Yang Y; Moody SA; Cabell JJ; Madon S
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):468-476. PubMed ID: 31524435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do laypeople recognize youth as a risk factor for false confession? A test of the 'common sense' hypothesis.
    Grove LJ; Kukucka J
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(2):185-205. PubMed ID: 34712091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of expert testimony and interrogation tactics on perceptions of confessions.
    Moffa MS; Platania J
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Apr; 100(2):563-70. PubMed ID: 17564233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The court of public opinion: lay perceptions of polygraph testing.
    Myers B; Latter R; Abdollahi-Arena MK
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):509-23. PubMed ID: 16718577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.