These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27149290)

  • 1. Validity of content-based techniques to distinguish true and fabricated statements: A meta-analysis.
    Oberlader VA; Naefgen C; Koppehele-Gossel J; Quinten L; Banse R; Schmidt AF
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Aug; 40(4):440-457. PubMed ID: 27149290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Validity of content-based techniques to distinguish true and fabricated statements: A meta-analysis": Correction to Oberlader et al. (2016).
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Apr; 43(2):165. PubMed ID: 30883181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can credibility criteria be assessed reliably? A meta-analysis of criteria-based content analysis.
    Hauch V; Sporer SL; Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):819-834. PubMed ID: 28594222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A call to improve the validity of criterion-based content analysis (CBCA): Results from a field-based study including 60 children's statements of sexual abuse.
    Welle I; Berclaz M; Lacasa MJ; Niveau G
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Oct; 43():111-119. PubMed ID: 27570234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guidance to detect deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales: are verbal content cues useful to detect false accusations?
    Sporer SL; Masip J; Cramer M
    Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 24720096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting deception in children: event familiarity affects criterion-based content analysis ratings.
    Pezdek K; Morrow A; Blandon-Gitlin I; Goodman GS; Quas JA; Saywitz KJ; Bidrose S; Pipe ME; Rogers M; Brodie L
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 14769124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review.
    Amado BG; Arce R; Fariña F; Vilariño M
    Int J Clin Health Psychol; 2016; 16(2):201-210. PubMed ID: 30487863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting deception in children: A meta-analysis.
    Gongola J; Scurich N; Quas JA
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 27685642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Judgment of the credibility of rape allegations: a content analytic field experiment].
    Krahé B; Kundrotas S
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(4):598-620. PubMed ID: 1295273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter-rater Reliability of Criteria-Based Content Analysis of Children's Statements of Abuse.
    Niveau G; Lacasa MJ; Berclaz M; Germond M
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1247-52. PubMed ID: 26272453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
    Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strong, but Wrong: Lay People's and Police Officers' Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception.
    Bogaard G; Meijer EH; Vrij A; Merckelbach H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156615. PubMed ID: 27258014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using reality monitoring to improve deception detection in the context of the cognitive interview for suspects.
    Logue M; Book AS; Frosina P; Huizinga T; Amos S
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 25844516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A true denial or a false confession? Assessing veracity of suspects' statements using MASAM and SVA.
    Wojciechowski BW; Gräns M; Lidén M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198211. PubMed ID: 29856813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of criteria-based content analysis (CBCA) at trial in free-narrative interviews.
    Roma P; Martini PS; Sabatello U; Tatarelli R; Ferracuti S
    Child Abuse Negl; 2011 Aug; 35(8):613-20. PubMed ID: 21880367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated.
    Luke TJ
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 Jul; 14(4):646-671. PubMed ID: 31173537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.
    Reinhard MA; Sporer SL; Scharmach M; Marksteiner T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 21707196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Information on a Motive to Lie Influences CBCA-Based Ratings and Veracity Judgments.
    Schemmel J; Steinhagen T; Ziegler M; Volbert R
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2021. PubMed ID: 32922341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deception Cues During High-Risk Situations: 911 Homicide Calls.
    Markey PM; Feeney E; Berry B; Hopkins L; Creedon I
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1040-1047. PubMed ID: 35687501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) Cannot Distinguish Between Truthful and Fabricated Accounts of a Negative Event.
    Bogaard G; Meijer EH; Vrij A; Merckelbach H
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():243. PubMed ID: 26941694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.