BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27149544)

  • 1. Adolescents' preferences regarding disclosure of incidental findings in genomic sequencing that are not medically actionable in childhood.
    Hufnagel SB; Martin LJ; Cassedy A; Hopkin RJ; Antommaria AH
    Am J Med Genet A; 2016 Aug; 170(8):2083-8. PubMed ID: 27149544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.
    McGowan ML; Prows CA; DeJonckheere M; Brinkman WB; Vaughn L; Myers MF
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):371-382. PubMed ID: 29806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey study.
    Lemke AA; Bick D; Dimmock D; Simpson P; Veith R
    Clin Genet; 2013 Sep; 84(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 23163796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.
    Regier DA; Peacock SJ; Pataky R; van der Hoek K; Jarvik GP; Hoch J; Veenstra D
    CMAJ; 2015 Apr; 187(6):E190-E197. PubMed ID: 25754703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Availability of treatment drives decisions of genetic health professionals about disclosure of incidental findings.
    Turbitt E; Wiest MM; Halliday JL; Amor DJ; Metcalfe SA
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2014 Oct; 22(10):1225-8. PubMed ID: 24496062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.
    Daack-Hirsch S; Driessnack M; Hanish A; Johnson VA; Shah LL; Simon CM; Williams JK
    Clin Genet; 2013 Jul; 84(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 23590238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors influencing NCGENES research participants' requests for non-medically actionable secondary findings.
    Roche MI; Griesemer I; Khan CM; Moore E; Lin FC; O'Daniel JM; Foreman AKM; Lee K; Powell BC; Berg JS; Evans JP; Henderson GE; Rini C
    Genet Med; 2019 May; 21(5):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 30237575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
    Berg JS; Amendola LM; Eng C; Van Allen E; Gray SW; Wagle N; Rehm HL; DeChene ET; Dulik MC; Hisama FM; Burke W; Spinner NB; Garraway L; Green RC; Plon S; Evans JP; Jarvik GP;
    Genet Med; 2013 Nov; 15(11):860-7. PubMed ID: 24195999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm?
    Anderson JA; Meyn MS; Shuman C; Zlotnik Shaul R; Mantella LE; Szego MJ; Bowdin S; Monfared N; Hayeems RZ
    J Med Ethics; 2017 Aug; 43(8):535-539. PubMed ID: 27888232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.
    Kulchak Rahm A; Bailey L; Fultz K; Fan A; Williams JL; Buchanan A; Davis FD; Murray MF; Williams MS
    Transl Behav Med; 2018 Jan; 8(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 29385584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitudes towards Genetic Information Delivered by High-Throughput Sequencing among Molecular Geneticists, Genetic Counselors, Medical Advisors and Students in France.
    Titerlea V; Dembélé D; Mandel JL; Laporte J
    Eur J Med Genet; 2020 Apr; 63(4):103770. PubMed ID: 31536829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice.
    Ryan KA; De Vries RG; Uhlmann WR; Roberts JS; Gornick MC
    J Genet Couns; 2017 Dec; 26(6):1197-1212. PubMed ID: 28357777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient preferences regarding incidental genomic findings discovered during tumor profiling.
    Yushak ML; Han G; Bouberhan S; Epstein L; DiGiovanna MP; Mougalian SS; Sanft TB; Abu-Khalaf MM; Chung GG; Stein SM; Goldberg SB; Pusztai L; Hofstatter EW
    Cancer; 2016 May; 122(10):1588-97. PubMed ID: 26970385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a decision aid for incidental genomic results, the Genomics ADvISER: protocol for a mixed methods randomised controlled trial.
    Shickh S; Clausen M; Mighton C; Casalino S; Joshi E; Glogowski E; Schrader KA; Scheer A; Elser C; Panchal S; Eisen A; Graham T; Aronson M; Semotiuk KM; Winter-Paquette L; Evans M; Lerner-Ellis J; Carroll JC; Hamilton JG; Offit K; Robson M; Thorpe KE; Laupacis A; Bombard Y
    BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e021876. PubMed ID: 29700101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pediatric reporting of genomic results study (PROGRESS): a mixed-methods, longitudinal, observational cohort study protocol to explore disclosure of actionable adult- and pediatric-onset genomic variants to minors and their parents.
    Savatt JM; Wagner JK; Joffe S; Rahm AK; Williams MS; Bradbury AR; Davis FD; Hergenrather J; Hu Y; Kelly MA; Kirchner HL; Meyer MN; Mozersky J; O'Dell SM; Pervola J; Seeley A; Sturm AC; Buchanan AH
    BMC Pediatr; 2020 May; 20(1):222. PubMed ID: 32414353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Views of primary care providers regarding the return of genome sequencing incidental findings.
    Strong KA; Zusevics KL; Bick D; Veith R
    Clin Genet; 2014 Nov; 86(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 24673592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choices of incidental findings of individuals undergoing genome wide sequencing, a single center's experience.
    Bishop CL; Strong KA; Dimmock DP
    Clin Genet; 2017 Jan; 91(1):137-140. PubMed ID: 27392285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Raising Genomic Citizens: Adolescents and the Return of Secondary Genomic Findings.
    Sabatello M; Appelbaum PS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2016 Jun; 44(2):292-308. PubMed ID: 27338605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findings.
    Jelsig AM; Qvist N; Brusgaard K; Ousager LB
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 23(10):1423-6. PubMed ID: 25604854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency and management of medically actionable incidental findings from genome and exome sequencing data: a systematic review.
    Elfatih A; Mohammed I; Abdelrahman D; Mifsud B
    Physiol Genomics; 2021 Sep; 53(9):373-384. PubMed ID: 34250816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.