1198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27150317)
1. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities.
Chew T; Ho KA; Loo CK
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 26294061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.
Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.
Wiethoff S; Hamada M; Rothwell JC
Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 24630848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five anodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 24hours.
Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
Neurophysiol Clin; 2019 Feb; 49(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 30635162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.
Ammann C; Lindquist MA; Celnik PA
Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(4):757-763. PubMed ID: 28420581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.
Jamil A; Batsikadze G; Kuo HI; Labruna L; Hasan A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA
J Physiol; 2017 Feb; 595(4):1273-1288. PubMed ID: 27723104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach.
Pellicciari MC; Brignani D; Miniussi C
Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():569-80. PubMed ID: 23845429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans.
Bashir S; Ahmad S; Alatefi M; Hamza A; Sharaf M; Fecteau S; Yoo WK
Physiol Rep; 2019 Jul; 7(13):e14087. PubMed ID: 31301123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
Ataoglu EE; Caglayan HB; Cengiz B
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation of the right M1 further facilitates left M1 excitability during crossed facilitation.
Cabibel V; Muthalib M; Teo WP; Perrey S
J Neurophysiol; 2018 Apr; 119(4):1266-1272. PubMed ID: 29357451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement.
Miyaguchi S; Onishi H; Kojima S; Sugawara K; Tsubaki A; Kirimoto H; Tamaki H; Yamamoto N
Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 1529():83-91. PubMed ID: 23891715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal, motor and somatosensory cortices on cortical excitability and pain perception - a double-blind randomised sham-controlled study.
Vaseghi B; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 42(7):2426-37. PubMed ID: 26275236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 'I-wave' Recruitment Determines Response to tDCS in the Upper Limb, but Only So Far.
McCambridge AB; Stinear JW; Byblow WD
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1124-9. PubMed ID: 26294062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneously applying cathodal tDCS with low frequency rTMS at the motor cortex boosts inhibitory aftereffects.
Han T; Xu Z; Liu C; Li S; Song P; Huang Q; Zhou Q; Lin Y; Wang Y
J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Aug; 324():108308. PubMed ID: 31181244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates motor responses evoked by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Cambieri C; Scelzo E; Li Voti P; Priori A; Accornero N; Inghilleri M
Neurosci Lett; 2012 Aug; 522(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 22732445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
