These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27150513)

  • 1. INDIVIDUAL DOSIMETRY IN DISPOSAL REPOSITORY OF HEAT-GENERATING NUCLEAR WASTE.
    Pang B; Saurí Suárez H; Becker F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):387-92. PubMed ID: 27150513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ICRP PUBLICATION 122: radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste.
    ; Weiss W; Larsson CM; McKenney C; Minon JP; Mobbs S; Schneider T; Umeki H; Hilden W; Pescatore C; Vesterlind M
    Ann ICRP; 2013 Jun; 42(3):1-57. PubMed ID: 23639723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Albedo Neutron Dosimetry in a Deep Geological Disposal Repository for High-Level Nuclear Waste.
    Pang B; Becker F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Apr; 174(3):308-314. PubMed ID: 27342450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calculation of Dose Rates at the Surface of Storage Containers for High-Level Radioactive Waste.
    Poenitz E; Walther C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Dec; 177(4):361-372. PubMed ID: 28472493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of Dose Rates Exterior to an Above-Ground Waste Storage Facility Using Radiation Transport Models.
    Mann JE; Zoeger N; Koppitsch R; Brandl A
    Health Phys; 2018 Oct; 115(4):539-544. PubMed ID: 30148819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential migration of buoyant LNAPL from intermediate level waste (ILW) emplaced in a geological disposal facility (GDF) for U.K. radioactive waste.
    Benbow SJ; Rivett MO; Chittenden N; Herbert AW; Watson S; Williams SJ; Norris S
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Oct; 167():1-22. PubMed ID: 25147021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmarking of MCNP for calculating dose rates at an interim storage facility for nuclear waste.
    Heuel-Fabianek B; Hille R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):424-7. PubMed ID: 16381760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Illustrative assessment of human health issues arising from the potential release of chemotoxic substances from a generic geological disposal facility for radioactive waste.
    Wilson JC; Thorne MC; Towler G; Norris S
    J Radiol Prot; 2011 Dec; 31(4):411-30. PubMed ID: 22089948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test case of the long term preliminary performance assessment for the L&IL radioactive waste repository Baita Bihor, Romania.
    Ene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):433-6. PubMed ID: 16403732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling transient heat transfer in nuclear waste repositories.
    Yang SY; Yeh HD
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Sep; 169(1-3):108-12. PubMed ID: 19376651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo calculations for efficiency calibration of a whole-body monitor using BOMAB phantoms of different sizes.
    Bhati S; Patni HK; Ghare VP; Singh IS; Nadar MY
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Mar; 148(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 21531750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo simulation of the operational quantities at the realistic mixed neutron-photon radiation fields CANEL and SIGMA.
    Lacoste V; Gressier V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):185-8. PubMed ID: 17578872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occupational radiation exposure during removal of radioactive reactor components from GRR-1 pool.
    Kontogeorgakos D; Tzika F; Valakis S; Stamatelatos IE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):632-5. PubMed ID: 21051436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo modeling for individual monitoring.
    Gualdrini G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):139-44. PubMed ID: 17533157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extension of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for long term dose assessment of high level nuclear waste disposal sites to uncertainties in the human behaviour.
    Albrecht A; Miquel S
    J Environ Radioact; 2010 Jan; 101(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 19758732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of precipitation, sorption and stable of isotope on maximum release rates of radionuclides from engineered barrier system (EBS) in deep repository.
    Malekifarsani A; Skachek MA
    J Environ Radioact; 2009 Oct; 100(10):807-14. PubMed ID: 19027996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Report of ICRP Task Group 80: 'radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste'.
    Weiss W
    Ann ICRP; 2012; 41(3-4):294-304. PubMed ID: 23089029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution to a more realistic approach in assessing the release of C-14 from low-level radioactive waste repositories.
    Bracke G; Müller W
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Dec; 102(3-4):210-6. PubMed ID: 19022527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The establishment of a radioactive waste disposal facility in Western Australia for low level waste.
    Hartley BM; Wall B; Munslow-Davies L; Toussaint LF; Hirschberg KJ; Terry KW; Shepherd M
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1998 Mar; 49(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 9451779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of counting efficiencies of a whole-body counter using Monte Carlo simulation with voxel phantoms.
    Takahashi M; Kinase S; Kramer R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):407-10. PubMed ID: 21131662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.