BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27150617)

  • 1. To hear or not to hear: Voice processing under visual load.
    Zäske R; Perlich MC; Schweinberger SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1488-95. PubMed ID: 27150617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial inattention abolishes voice adaptation.
    Zäske R; Fritz C; Schweinberger SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):603-13. PubMed ID: 23315486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interactions Between Modality of Working Memory Load and Perceptual Load in Distractor Processing.
    Koshino H; Olid P
    J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(3):135-49. PubMed ID: 26273937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceiving vocal age and gender: an adaptation approach.
    Zäske R; Skuk VG; Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):583-93. PubMed ID: 24140826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptation aftereffects in vocal emotion perception elicited by expressive faces and voices.
    Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e81691. PubMed ID: 24236215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voice aftereffects of adaptation to speaker identity.
    Zäske R; Schweinberger SR; Kawahara H
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):38-45. PubMed ID: 20430084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory adaptation in voice perception.
    Schweinberger SR; Casper C; Hauthal N; Kaufmann JM; Kawahara H; Kloth N; Robertson DM; Simpson AP; Zäske R
    Curr Biol; 2008 May; 18(9):684-8. PubMed ID: 18450448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.
    Park S; Kim MS; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory working memory load impairs visual ventral stream processing: toward a unified model of attentional load.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Bühler M; Menz MM; Rose M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 22(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 19302005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction.
    Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
    Francis AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of working memory in auditory selective attention.
    Dalton P; Santangelo V; Spence C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2126-32. PubMed ID: 19557667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load.
    Yi DJ; Woodman GF; Widders D; Marois R; Chun MM
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 7(9):992-6. PubMed ID: 15286791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: a computational approach.
    Kyllingsbæk S; Sy JL; Giesbrecht B
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1487-97. PubMed ID: 21145901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptation to faces and voices: unimodal, cross-modal, and sex-specific effects.
    Little AC; Feinberg DR; Debruine LM; Jones BC
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2297-305. PubMed ID: 24068117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.
    Scalf PE; Dux PE; Marois R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2593-604. PubMed ID: 21281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.