These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27150618)

  • 1. An investigation of the mechanisms underlying the effects of viewing distance and stimulus length on attentional asymmetries during line bisection.
    Nicholls ME; Beckman E; Churches O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1351-62. PubMed ID: 27150618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More far is more right: Manual and ocular line bisections, but not the Judd illusion, depend on radial space.
    Rinaldi L; Bertolini G; Bockisch CJ; Maravita A; Girelli L; Brugger P
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Apr; 122():34-44. PubMed ID: 29428805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Thut G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86(100):370-80. PubMed ID: 24128738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
    Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further to the right: Viewing distance modulates attentional asymmetries ('pseudoneglect') during visual exploration.
    Hartmann M; Sommer NR; Diana L; Müri RM; Eberhard-Moscicka AK
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Feb; 129():40-48. PubMed ID: 30471991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of cognitive load on horizontal and vertical spatial asymmetries.
    Ciricugno A; Bartlett ML; Gwinn OS; Carragher DJ; Nicholls MER
    Laterality; 2021 Nov; 26(6):706-724. PubMed ID: 33906579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of the relationship between free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli.
    Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Berberovic N; Smith A; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 May; 19(3):289-301. PubMed ID: 15062866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.
    Mennemeier M; Pierce CA; Chatterjee A; Anderson B; Jewell G; Dowler R; Woods AJ; Glenn T; Mark VW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1194-211. PubMed ID: 16197678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers.
    Fink GR; Marshall JC; Weiss PH; Zilles K
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 2):S59-67. PubMed ID: 11373134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention in near space.
    Longo MR; Trippier S; Vagnoni E; Lourenco SF
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():350-7. PubMed ID: 25446963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of body and environment-centred coordinates on free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for vertical and horizontal stimuli.
    Nicholls ME; Smith A; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Cortex; 2006 Apr; 42(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 16771039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines.
    Toba MN; Cavanagh P; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Influence of Focused and Sustained Spatial Attention on the Allocation of Spatial Attention.
    Lamb DG; Balavage KT; Williamson JB; Knight LA; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Jan; 25(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 30486914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between vertical stimulation and horizontal attentional asymmetries.
    Nicholls ME; Thomas NA; Loetscher T; Wignall S; Yates MJ; Forte JD; Spence CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2384-96. PubMed ID: 22650990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visuospatial biases in preschool children: Evidence from line bisection in three-dimensional space.
    Patro K; Nuerk HC; Brugger P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Sep; 173():16-27. PubMed ID: 29649699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rightward and leftward bisection biases in spatial neglect: two sides of the same coin?
    Savazzi S; Posteraro L; Veronesi G; Mancini F
    Brain; 2007 Aug; 130(Pt 8):2070-84. PubMed ID: 17584772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.