These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27150840)

  • 1. Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures.
    Christianson K; Luke SG; Hussey EK; Wochna KL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1380-1405. PubMed ID: 27150840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic re-interpretation and garden path recovery.
    Sturt P
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):477-88. PubMed ID: 17178115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading.
    Gordon PC; Hendrick R; Johnson M; Lee Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1304-21. PubMed ID: 17087585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension.
    Bartek B; Lewis RL; Vasishth S; Smith MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1178-98. PubMed ID: 21707210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Background Speech Effects on Sentence Processing during Reading: An Eye Movement Study.
    Hyönä J; Ekholm M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152133. PubMed ID: 27003410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misinterpretations in agreement and agreement attraction.
    Patson ND; Husband EM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):950-71. PubMed ID: 25624171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: eye-tracking evidence from German.
    Knoeferle P; Crocker MW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2338-71. PubMed ID: 19418379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benchmark eye movement effects during natural reading in autism spectrum disorder.
    Howard PL; Liversedge SP; Benson V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jan; 43(1):109-127. PubMed ID: 27504678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. I "hear" what you're "saying": Auditory perceptual simulation, reading speed, and reading comprehension.
    Zhou P; Christianson K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):972-95. PubMed ID: 25679796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Garden-path sentences and the diversity of their (mis)representations.
    Ceháková M; Chromý J
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0288817. PubMed ID: 37463143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The time-course of lexical and structural processes in sentence comprehension.
    Tily H; Fedorenko E; Gibson E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):910-27. PubMed ID: 19746299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is it that lingers? Garden-path (mis)interpretations in younger and older adults.
    Malyutina S; den Ouden DB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):880-906. PubMed ID: 25920901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bilingual lexical access in context: evidence from eye movements during reading.
    Libben MR; Titone DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 19271853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of sense-contingent argument structure frequencies on ambiguity resolution in aphasia.
    Huck A; Thompson RL; Cruice M; Marshall J
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jun; 100():171-194. PubMed ID: 28392303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis.
    Ferreira F; Christianson K; Hollingworth A
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2001 Jan; 30(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 11291182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery.
    Jacob G; Felser C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):907-25. PubMed ID: 25397360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.