These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Identification of key residues in proteins by using their physical characters. Chen C; Li L; Xiao Y Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Apr; 73(4 Pt 1):041926. PubMed ID: 16711855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. SRide: a server for identifying stabilizing residues in proteins. Magyar C; Gromiha MM; Pujadas G; Tusnády GE; Simon I Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jul; 33(Web Server issue):W303-5. PubMed ID: 15980477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. PRIGSA: protein repeat identification by graph spectral analysis. Chakrabarty B; Parekh N J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2014 Dec; 12(6):1442009. PubMed ID: 25385083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. PDB2Graph: A toolbox for identifying critical amino acids map in proteins based on graph theory. Niknam N; Khakzad H; Arab SS; Naderi-Manesh H Comput Biol Med; 2016 May; 72():151-9. PubMed ID: 27043857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Geometry of nonbonded interactions involving planar groups in proteins. Chakrabarti P; Bhattacharyya R Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2007; 95(1-3):83-137. PubMed ID: 17629549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Uncovering network systems within protein structures. Greene LH; Higman VA J Mol Biol; 2003 Dec; 334(4):781-91. PubMed ID: 14636602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Decomposing protein networks into domain-domain interactions. Albrecht M; Huthmacher C; Tosatto SC; Lengauer T Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():ii220-1. PubMed ID: 16204107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Can molecular dynamics simulations help in discriminating correct from erroneous protein 3D models? Taly JF; Marin A; Gibrat JF BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():6. PubMed ID: 18179702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Residues crucial for maintaining short paths in network communication mediate signaling in proteins. del Sol A; Fujihashi H; Amoros D; Nussinov R Mol Syst Biol; 2006; 2():2006.0019. PubMed ID: 16738564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Amino acid network for the discrimination of native protein structures from decoys. Zhou J; Yan W; Hu G; Shen B Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2014; 15(6):522-8. PubMed ID: 25059328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Self-organized emergence of folded protein-like network structures from geometric constraints. Molkenthin N; Mühle S; Mey ASJS; Timme M PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229230. PubMed ID: 32106258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Multiple contact network is a key determinant to protein folding rates. Gromiha MM J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1130-5. PubMed ID: 19338373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A hydrophobic spine stabilizes a surface-exposed α-helix according to analysis of the solvent-accessible surface area. Liou YF; Huang HL; Ho SY BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):503. PubMed ID: 28155647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Prediction of interacting protein residues using sequence and structure data. Franke V; Sikić M; Vlahoviček K Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 819():233-51. PubMed ID: 22183541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. FastContact: a free energy scoring tool for protein-protein complex structures. Champ PC; Camacho CJ Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W556-60. PubMed ID: 17537824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Improved prediction of critical residues for protein function based on network and phylogenetic analyses. Thibert B; Bredesen DE; del Rio G BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 6():213. PubMed ID: 16124876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]