302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27151747)
1. Influence of the Magnetic Field Strength on Image Contrast in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR Imaging: Comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T.
Hata H; Inoue Y; Nakajima A; Komi S; Miyatake H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 16(2):109-114. PubMed ID: 27151747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image Non-Uniformity Correction for 3-T Gd-EOB-DTPA-Enhanced MR Imaging of the Liver.
Ogasawara G; Inoue Y; Matsunaga K; Fujii K; Hata H; Takato Y
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 16(2):115-122. PubMed ID: 27385553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring hepatic functional reserve using T1 mapping of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced 3T MR imaging: A preliminary study comparing with
Nakagawa M; Namimoto T; Shimizu K; Morita K; Sakamoto F; Oda S; Nakaura T; Utsunomiya D; Shiraishi S; Yamashita Y
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jul; 92():116-123. PubMed ID: 28624009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal solid organ and major vessel: comparison of enhancement effect between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
Tamada T; Ito K; Sone T; Yamamoto A; Yoshida K; Kakuba K; Tanimoto D; Higashi H; Yamashita T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Mar; 29(3):636-40. PubMed ID: 19243060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of high-stage liver fibrosis using ADC value on diffusion-weighted imaging and quantitative enhancement ratio at the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T.
Harada TL; Saito K; Araki Y; Matsubayashi J; Nagao T; Sugimoto K; Tokuuye K
Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):509-516. PubMed ID: 28853292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI of the liver: correlation of relative hepatic enhancement, relative renal enhancement, and liver to kidneys enhancement ratio with serum hepatic enzyme levels and eGFR.
Talakic E; Steiner J; Kalmar P; Lutfi A; Quehenberger F; Reiter U; Fuchsjäger M; Schöllnast H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Apr; 83(4):607-11. PubMed ID: 24380639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cirrhotic liver parenchyma: A comparison between gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid and gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid.
Lin CY; Chang WC; Chou CT; Chen RC
J Chin Med Assoc; 2015 Nov; 78(11):666-72. PubMed ID: 26341453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hepatic parenchymal enhancement at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with morphological grading of severity in cirrhosis and chronic hepatitis.
Kanki A; Tamada T; Higaki A; Noda Y; Tanimoto D; Sato T; Higashi H; Ito K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 22227353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative analysis of liver function using superparamagnetic iron oxide- and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: comparison with Technetium-99m galactosyl serum albumin scintigraphy.
Nishie A; Ushijima Y; Tajima T; Asayama Y; Ishigami K; Kakihara D; Nakayama T; Takayama Y; Okamoto D; Abe K; Obara M; Yoshimitsu K; Honda H
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 81(6):1100-4. PubMed ID: 21435811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and validation of a predictor of insufficient enhancement during the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Cui E; Long W; Luo L; Hu M; Huang L; Chen X
Acta Radiol; 2017 Oct; 58(10):1174-1181. PubMed ID: 28090793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hypointense hepatocellular nodules on hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI: can increasing the flip angle improve conspicuity of lesions?
Tamada T; Ito K; Yamamoto A; Yasokawa K; Higaki A; Kanki A; Sato T; Tanimoto D; Higashi H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 May; 37(5):1093-9. PubMed ID: 23148032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Imaging features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.
Péporté AR; Sommer WH; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Zech CJ
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):e101-6. PubMed ID: 23159401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radial MRI during free breathing in contrast-enhanced hepatobiliary phase imaging.
Gomi T; Nagamoto M; Hasegawa M; Tabata A; Iwasaki M; Ooka M; Murata N; Tsunoo M; Iizuka Y; Kohda E; Shiraga N
Acta Radiol; 2014 Feb; 55(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 23873886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a respiratory navigator-gating technique in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of liver tumors.
Ogasawara G; Inoue Y; Matsunaga K; Fujii K; Hata H; Miyatake H; Iwadate Y
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1232-7. PubMed ID: 27161075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR prediction of liver fibrosis using a liver-specific contrast agent: Superparamagnetic iron oxide versus Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Nishie A; Asayama Y; Ishigami K; Tajima T; Kakihara D; Nakayama T; Takayama Y; Okamoto D; Taketomi A; Shirabe K; Fujita N; Obara M; Yoshimitsu K; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Sep; 36(3):664-71. PubMed ID: 22532503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced MR finding of radiation-induced hepatic injury: relationship to absorbed dose and time course after irradiation.
Okamoto D; Nishie A; Asayama Y; Tajima T; Ishigami K; Kakihara D; Nakayama T; Ohga S; Yoshitake T; Shioyama Y; Honda H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 32(6):660-4. PubMed ID: 24666574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic MR imaging of liver metastases with Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Stern W; Schick F; Kopp AF; Reimer P; Shamsi K; Claussen CD; Laniado M
Acta Radiol; 2000 May; 41(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 10866081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced-MR imaging in the inflammation stage of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in mice.
Yamada T; Obata A; Kashiwagi Y; Rokugawa T; Matsushima S; Hamada T; Watabe H; Abe K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):724-729. PubMed ID: 26979540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects.
Dahlström N; Persson A; Albiin N; Smedby O; Brismar TB
Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 17453513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of hepatobiliary uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA on the hepatic venous phase of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging on a 3.0-T apparatus: comparison between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.
Fujinaga Y; Ohya A; Matsushita T; Kurozumi M; Ueda K; Kitou Y; Ueda H; Kadoya M
Jpn J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 29(10):695-700. PubMed ID: 22009420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
