These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27151836)

  • 1. Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?
    Cowie S; Davison M; Blumhardt L; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 27151836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A model for discriminating reinforcers in time and space.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jun; 127():62-73. PubMed ID: 27016156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model for food and stimulus changes that signal time-based contingency changes.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Nov; 102(3):289-310. PubMed ID: 25219928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Control by past and present stimuli depends on the discriminated reinforcer differential.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 28940396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling choice across time: Effects of response-reinforcer discriminability.
    Davison M; Cowie S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 Jan; 117(1):36-52. PubMed ID: 34734651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Being there on time: Reinforcer effects on timing and locating.
    Cowie S; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Mar; 113(2):340-362. PubMed ID: 31994217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environment tracking and signal following in a reinforcer-ratio reversal procedure.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():208-224. PubMed ID: 30315866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.
    Boutros N; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 21909166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concurrent schedules: discriminating reinforcer-ratio reversals at a fixed time after the previous reinforcer.
    Cowie S; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Sep; 100(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 23943395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 10966094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Choice, time and food: continuous cyclical changes in food probability between reinforcers.
    Miranda-Dukoski L; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):406-21. PubMed ID: 24615528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral momentum and accumulation of mass in multiple schedules.
    Craig AR; Cunningham PJ; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 May; 103(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 25787824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Divided stimulus control: Which key did you peck, or what color was it?
    Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):107-124. PubMed ID: 29194638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinforcement contingencies and signal detection.
    Nevin JA; Jenkins P; Whittaker S; Yarensky P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Jan; 37(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 7057131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
    Doughty AH; Richards JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No impact of repeated extinction exposures on operant responding maintained by different reinforcer rates.
    Bai JYH; Podlesnik CA
    Behav Processes; 2017 May; 138():29-33. PubMed ID: 28216120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.
    McCarthy DC; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 1940763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timing compound stimuli: Relative reinforcer probabilities divide stimulus control in the multiple peak procedure.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):124-138. PubMed ID: 31804106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.
    Nevin JA; Davison M; Odum AL; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Sep; 88(2):285-317. PubMed ID: 17970420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response strength in extreme multiple schedules.
    McLean AP; Grace RC; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jan; 97(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 22287804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.