BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27152676)

  • 1. Performance of search strategies to retrieve systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy from the Cochrane Library.
    Huang Y; Yang Z; Wang J; Zhuo L; Li Z; Zhan S
    J Evid Based Med; 2016 May; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 27152676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
    Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying diagnostic studies in MEDLINE: reducing the number needed to read.
    Bachmann LM; Coray R; Estermann P; Ter Riet G
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2002; 9(6):653-8. PubMed ID: 12386115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do published search filters to identify diagnostic test accuracy studies perform adequately?
    Ritchie G; Glanville J; Lefebvre C
    Health Info Libr J; 2007 Sep; 24(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 17714173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions.
    Golder S; McIntosh HM; Loke Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 May; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16681854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhancing access to reports of randomized trials published world-wide--the contribution of EMBASE records to the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library.
    Lefebvre C; Eisinga A; McDonald S; Paul N
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 5():13. PubMed ID: 18826567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey.
    Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
    BMJ; 2005 Jan; 330(7482):68. PubMed ID: 15619601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract.
    Doust JA; Pietrzak E; Sanders S; Glasziou PP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 May; 58(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 15845330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. lilacs search strategy for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Pereira RA; Puga MEDS; Atallah ÁN; Macedo EC; Macedo CR
    Health Info Libr J; 2019 Sep; 36(3):223-243. PubMed ID: 31271504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed.
    Salvador-Oliván JA; Marco-Cuenca G; Arquero-Avilés R
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2021 Oct; 109(4):561-574. PubMed ID: 34858085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of filters for the retrieval of studies of clinical examination from Medline.
    Shaikh N; Badgett RG; Pi M; Wilczynski NL; McKibbon KA; Ketchum AM; Haynes RB
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Oct; 13(4):e82. PubMed ID: 22011384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should methodological filters for diagnostic test accuracy studies be used in systematic reviews of psychometric instruments? A case study involving screening for postnatal depression.
    Mann R; Gilbody SM
    Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; 1():9. PubMed ID: 22588034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The efficiency of database searches for creating systematic reviews was improved by search filters.
    Budhram D; Navarro-Ruan T; Haynes RB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Mar; 95():1-6. PubMed ID: 29191446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publications on diagnostic test evaluation in family medicine journals: an optimal search strategy.
    Devillé WL; Bezemer PD; Bouter LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Jan; 53(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 10693905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying diagnostic accuracy studies in EMBASE.
    Bachmann LM; Estermann P; Kronenberg C; ter Riet G
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2003 Jul; 91(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 12883560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of search filters for retrieval of literature on the molecular epidemiology of cancer.
    Ugolini D; Neri M; Casilli C; Bonassi S
    Mutat Res; 2010 Aug; 701(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 20685344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy.
    Shojania KG; Bero LA
    Eff Clin Pract; 2001; 4(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 11525102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Systematic review of diagnostic tests accuracy: a narrative review].
    de Oliveira GM; Camargo FT; Gonçalves EC; Duarte CV; Guimarães CA
    Rev Col Bras Cir; 2010 Apr; 37(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 20549106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protocol: a systematic review of studies developing and/or evaluating search strategies to identify prognosis studies.
    Corp N; Jordan JL; Hayden JA; Irvin E; Parker R; Smith A; van der Windt DA
    Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 6(1):88. PubMed ID: 28427475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.