These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27152714)

  • 1. Expert QSAR system for predicting the bioconcentration factor under the REACH regulation.
    Grisoni F; Consonni V; Vighi M; Villa S; Todeschini R
    Environ Res; 2016 Jul; 148():507-512. PubMed ID: 27152714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of QSAR models for predicting the partition coefficient (log P) of chemicals under the REACH regulation.
    Cappelli CI; Benfenati E; Cester J
    Environ Res; 2015 Nov; 143(Pt A):26-32. PubMed ID: 26432472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between bioconcentration factor (BCF) data provided by industry to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and data derived from QSAR models.
    Petoumenou MI; Pizzo F; Cester J; Fernández A; Benfenati E
    Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 142():529-34. PubMed ID: 26282223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. QSAR models for bioconcentration: is the increase in the complexity justified by more accurate predictions?
    Grisoni F; Consonni V; Villa S; Vighi M; Todeschini R
    Chemosphere; 2015 May; 127():171-9. PubMed ID: 25703779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting PBT and CMR properties of substances of very high concern (SVHCs) using QSAR models, and application for K-REACH.
    Moon J; Lee B; Ra JS; Kim KT
    Toxicol Rep; 2020; 7():995-1000. PubMed ID: 32874922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation and comparison of benchmark QSAR models to predict a relevant REACH endpoint: The bioconcentration factor (BCF).
    Gissi A; Lombardo A; Roncaglioni A; Gadaleta D; Mangiatordi GF; Nicolotti O; Benfenati E
    Environ Res; 2015 Feb; 137():398-409. PubMed ID: 25616163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integration of QSAR models for bioconcentration suitable for REACH.
    Gissi A; Nicolotti O; Carotti A; Gadaleta D; Lombardo A; Benfenati E
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jul; 456-457():325-32. PubMed ID: 23624006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting the bioconcentration factor of highly hydrophobic organic chemicals.
    Garg R; Smith CJ
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 69():252-9. PubMed ID: 24759698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linear and non-linear relationships between bioconcentration and hydrophobicity: theoretical consideration.
    Wen Y; He J; Liu X; Li J; Zhao Y
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Sep; 34(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 22543246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PBT assessment under REACH: Screening for low aquatic bioaccumulation with QSAR classifications based on physicochemical properties to replace BCF in vivo testing on fish.
    Nendza M; Kühne R; Lombardo A; Strempel S; Schüürmann G
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Mar; 616-617():97-106. PubMed ID: 29107783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating QSAR and read-across for environmental assessment.
    Benfenati E; Roncaglioni A; Petoumenou MI; Cappelli CI; Gini G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(7-9):605-18. PubMed ID: 26535447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Filling environmental data gaps with QSPR for ionic liquids: Modeling n-octanol/water coefficient.
    Rybinska A; Sosnowska A; Grzonkowska M; Barycki M; Puzyn T
    J Hazard Mater; 2016 Feb; 303():137-44. PubMed ID: 26530890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental risk assessment of selected organic chemicals based on TOC test and QSAR estimation models.
    Chi Y; Zhang H; Huang Q; Lin Y; Ye G; Zhu H; Dong S
    J Environ Sci (China); 2018 Feb; 64():23-31. PubMed ID: 29478644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A combined QSAR and partial order ranking approach to risk assessment.
    Carlsen L
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):133-46. PubMed ID: 16644554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the mechanisms of bioconcentration through QSAR classification trees.
    Grisoni F; Consonni V; Vighi M; Villa S; Todeschini R
    Environ Int; 2016 Mar; 88():198-205. PubMed ID: 26760717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using toxicological evidence from QSAR models in practice.
    Benfenati E; Pardoe S; Martin T; Gonella Diaza R; Lombardo A; Manganaro A; Gissi A
    ALTEX; 2013; 30(1):19-40. PubMed ID: 23338804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonlinear dependence of fish bioconcentration on n-octanol/water partition coefficient.
    Bintein S; Devillers J; Karcher W
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1993; 1(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 8790626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using molecular docking between organic chemicals and lipid membrane to revise the well known octanol-water partition coefficient of the mixture.
    Wang T; Zhou X; Wang D; Yin D; Lin Z
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jul; 34(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 22445871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The discrimination of excess toxicity from baseline effect: effect of bioconcentration.
    Su LM; Liu X; Wang Y; Li JJ; Wang XH; Sheng LX; Zhao YH
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jun; 484():137-45. PubMed ID: 24698800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative modeling of bioconcentration factors of carbonyl herbicides using multivariate image analysis.
    Freitas MR; Barigye SJ; Daré JK; Freitas MP
    Chemosphere; 2016 Jun; 152():190-5. PubMed ID: 26971171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.