These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27153039)

  • 1. Current and Emerging Options for Documenting Scars and Evaluating Therapeutic Progress.
    Poetschke J; Schwaiger H; Gauglitz GG
    Dermatol Surg; 2017 Jan; 43 Suppl 1():S25-S36. PubMed ID: 27153039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery.
    Truong PT; Lee JC; Soer B; Gaul CA; Olivotto IA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Feb; 119(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 17230080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Acne Scars: How to Assess Them and What to Tell the Patient.
    Fife D
    Dermatol Clin; 2016 Apr; 34(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 27015781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: a systematic review.
    Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Cisari C; Bravini E
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2015 Dec; 38(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 26426285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective and subjective treatment evaluation of scars using optical coherence tomography, sonography, photography, and standardised questionnaires.
    Reinholz M; Schwaiger H; Poetschke J; Epple A; Ruzicka T; Von Braunmühl T; Gauglitz GG
    Eur J Dermatol; 2016 Dec; 26(6):599-608. PubMed ID: 27762215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New Atrophic Acne Scar Classification: Reliability of Assessments Based on Size, Shape, and Number.
    Kang S; Lozada VT; Bettoli V; Tan J; Rueda MJ; Layton A; Petit L; Dréno B
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Jun; 15(6):693-702. PubMed ID: 27272075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The dermatology life quality index as a means to assess life quality in patients with different scar types.
    Reinholz M; Poetschke J; Schwaiger H; Epple A; Ruzicka T; Gauglitz GG
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2015 Nov; 29(11):2112-9. PubMed ID: 25866177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to assess scar hypertrophy--a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: a new objective method.
    Kaartinen IS; Välisuo PO; Bochko V; Alander JT; Kuokkanen HO
    Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 21518084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars.
    Roques C; Teot L
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18048870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subjective Tools for Burn Scar Assessment: An Integrative Review.
    da Costa PTL; Echevarría-Guanilo ME; Gonçalves N; Girondi JBR; Gonçalves ADC
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2021 Jun; 34(6):1-10. PubMed ID: 33979826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.
    Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Stissi V; Franchignoni F
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(25):2055-63. PubMed ID: 19888834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current scales for assessing human scarring: a review.
    Durani P; McGrouther DA; Ferguson MW
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Jun; 62(6):713-20. PubMed ID: 19303834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Updated international clinical recommendations on scar management: part 1--evaluating the evidence.
    Gold MH; Berman B; Clementoni MT; Gauglitz GG; Nahai F; Murcia C
    Dermatol Surg; 2014 Aug; 40(8):817-24. PubMed ID: 25068543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Management of scars: updated practical guidelines and use of silicones.
    Meaume S; Le Pillouer-Prost A; Richert B; Roseeuw D; Vadoud J
    Eur J Dermatol; 2014; 24(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 25141160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating Current Scar Assessment Methods.
    Lipman K; Wang M; Berthiaume E; Holloway J; Da Lio A; Ting K; Soo C; Zheng Z
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):222-231. PubMed ID: 31688125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of vascularity in the scar: A systematic review.
    Deng H; Li-Tsang CWP
    Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1253-1265. PubMed ID: 30545695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-sectional survey of awareness and behavioral pattern regarding acne and acne scar based on smartphone application.
    Park SY; Park MY; Suh DH; Kwon HH; Min S; Lee SJ; Lee WJ; Lee MW; Ahn HH; Kang H; Lee JB; Ro YS; Ahn KJ; Kim MN; Kim KJ; Kim NI;
    Int J Dermatol; 2016 Jun; 55(6):645-52. PubMed ID: 26340516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Updated international clinical recommendations on scar management: part 2--algorithms for scar prevention and treatment.
    Gold MH; McGuire M; Mustoe TA; Pusic A; Sachdev M; Waibel J; Murcia C;
    Dermatol Surg; 2014 Aug; 40(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 25068544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current tools for noninvasive objective assessment of skin scars.
    Perry DM; McGrouther DA; Bayat A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Sep; 126(3):912-923. PubMed ID: 20811225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective scar assessment tools: a clinimetric appraisal.
    Verhaegen PDHM; van der Wal MBA; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PPM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Apr; 127(4):1561-1570. PubMed ID: 21460665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.