These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27153466)

  • 1. On Conducting Construct Validity Meta-Analyses for the Rorschach: A Reply to Tibon Czopp and Zeligman (2016).
    Mihura JL; Meyer GJ; Dumitrascu N; Bombel G
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 27153466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The validity of individual Rorschach variables: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system.
    Mihura JL; Meyer GJ; Dumitrascu N; Bombel G
    Psychol Bull; 2013 May; 139(3):548-605. PubMed ID: 22925137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) Psychometric Validity of Individual Variables.
    Tibon Czopp S; Zeligman R
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 27153465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of meta-analyses in the otolaryngological literature.
    Rudmik LR; Walen SG; Dixon E; Dort J
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 139(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 18656713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical primer: methodology and reporting of meta-analyses.
    Buccheri S; Sodeck GH; Capodanno D
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Apr; 53(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 29538746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal stability in the Rorschach method: a meta-analytic review.
    Gronnerod C
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Jun; 80(3):272-93. PubMed ID: 12763701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature.
    Klimo P; Thompson CJ; Ragel BT; Boop FA
    J Neurosurg; 2014 Apr; 120(4):796-810. PubMed ID: 24460488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Judgment Calls on Meta-Analytic Findings.
    Tarrahi F; Eisend M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(2-3):314-9. PubMed ID: 27055205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Rorschach: facts, fictions, and future.
    Viglione DJ; Hilsenroth MJ
    Psychol Assess; 2001 Dec; 13(4):452-71. PubMed ID: 11793891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rorschach scores in applied clinical practice: a survey of perceived validity by experienced clinicians.
    Meyer GJ; Hsiao WC; Viglione DJ; Mihura JL; Abraham LM
    J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(4):351-65. PubMed ID: 23452352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standards, accuracy, and questions of bias in Rorschach meta-analyses: reply to Wood, Garb, Nezworski, Lilienfeld, and Duke (2015).
    Mihura JL; Meyer GJ; Bombel G; Dumitrascu N
    Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 141(1):250-260. PubMed ID: 25581288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
    Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of Rorschach Inkblot scores for discriminating psychopaths from non-psychopaths in forensic populations: a meta-analysis.
    Wood JM; Lilienfeld SO; Nezworski MT; Garb HN; Allen KH; Wildermuth JL
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Jun; 22(2):336-49. PubMed ID: 20528061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The meta-analytic approach to research integration.
    Onyskiw JE
    Can J Nurs Res; 1996; 28(3):69-85. PubMed ID: 8997940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Controversy and debate on credibility ceilings. Paper 1: Fundamental problems with the "credibility ceiling" method for meta-analyses.
    Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():208-210. PubMed ID: 32450128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.