These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27153993)

  • 1. The limits of defaults: why french fries trump apple slices.
    Wansink B; Just DR
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 May; 9():263. PubMed ID: 27153993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What would Batman eat?: priming children to make healthier fast food choices.
    Wansink B; Shimizu M; Camps G
    Pediatr Obes; 2012 Apr; 7(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 22434751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The application of defaults to optimize parents' health-based choices for children.
    Loeb KL; Radnitz C; Keller K; Schwartz MB; Marcus S; Pierson RN; Shannon M; DeLaurentis D
    Appetite; 2017 Jun; 113():368-375. PubMed ID: 28257942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Switching up sides: Using choice architecture to alter children's menus in restaurants.
    Ferrante MJ; Johnson SL; Miller J; Bellows LL
    Appetite; 2022 Jan; 168():105704. PubMed ID: 34547347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Application of Optimal Defaults to Improve Elementary School Lunch Selections: Proof of Concept.
    Loeb KL; Radnitz C; Keller KL; Schwartz MB; Zucker N; Marcus S; Pierson RN; Shannon M; DeLaurentis D
    J Sch Health; 2018 Apr; 88(4):265-271. PubMed ID: 29498061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Micro-marketing healthier choices: effects of personalized ordering suggestions on restaurant purchases.
    Bedard K; Kuhn P
    J Health Econ; 2015 Jan; 39():106-22. PubMed ID: 25544398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Children's preference for large portions: prevalence, determinants, and consequences.
    Colapinto CK; Fitzgerald A; Taper LJ; Veugelers PJ
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2007 Jul; 107(7):1183-90. PubMed ID: 17604749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of Pricing Strategies on French Fries and Fruit Purchases among University Students: Results from an On-Campus Restaurant Experiment.
    Deliens T; Deforche B; Annemans L; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Clarys P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165298. PubMed ID: 27812123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Children's meals in restaurants: families need more help to make healthy choices.
    Wootan MG
    Child Obes; 2012 Feb; 8(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 22799476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Well, that's what came with it. A qualitative study of U.S. mothers' perceptions of healthier default options for children's meals at fast-food restaurants.
    Henry HK; Borzekowski DL
    Appetite; 2015 Apr; 87():108-15. PubMed ID: 25529818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a structured observational method for the systematic assessment of school food-choice architecture.
    Ozturk OD; McInnes MM; Blake CE; Frongillo EA; Jones SJ
    Ecol Food Nutr; 2016; 55(2):119-40. PubMed ID: 26654767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in children's meal orders following healthy menu modifications at a regional U.S. restaurant chain.
    Anzman-Frasca S; Mueller MP; Sliwa S; Dolan PR; Harelick L; Roberts SB; Washburn K; Economos CD
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2015 May; 23(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 25919925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emolabeling increases healthy food choices among grade school children in a structured grocery aisle setting.
    Privitera GJ; Phillips TE; Zuraikat FM; Paque R
    Appetite; 2015 Sep; 92():173-7. PubMed ID: 26009207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. School food environments and practices affect dietary behaviors of US public school children.
    Briefel RR; Crepinsek MK; Cabili C; Wilson A; Gleason PM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Feb; 109(2 Suppl):S91-107. PubMed ID: 19166677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mental health and food consumption among California children 5-11 years of age.
    Banta JE; Khoie-Mayer RN; Somaiya CK; McKinney O; Segovia-Siapco G
    Nutr Health; 2013; 22(3-4):237-53. PubMed ID: 26399270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumption of low-nutrient, energy-dense foods and beverages at school, home, and other locations among school lunch participants and nonparticipants.
    Briefel RR; Wilson A; Gleason PM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Feb; 109(2 Suppl):S79-90. PubMed ID: 19166676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. School children's own views, roles and contribution to choices regarding diet and activity in Spain.
    Lopez-Dicastillo O; Grande G; Callery P
    Child Care Health Dev; 2013 Jan; 39(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 22329506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nudging healthy and sustainable food choices: three randomized controlled field experiments using a vegetarian lunch-default as a normative signal.
    Hansen PG; Schilling M; Malthesen MS
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2021 Jun; 43(2):392-397. PubMed ID: 31786590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. School lunch menus and 11 to 12 year old children's food choice in three secondary schools in England-are the nutritional standards being met?
    Gould R; Russell J; Barker ME
    Appetite; 2006 Jan; 46(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 16298457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Healthy convenience: nudging students toward healthier choices in the lunchroom.
    Hanks AS; Just DR; Smith LE; Wansink B
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2012 Aug; 34(3):370-6. PubMed ID: 22294661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.