These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27154487)

  • 1. Effect of Binding Pose and Modeled Structures on SVMGen and GlideScore Enrichment of Chemical Libraries.
    Xu D; Meroueh SO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1139-51. PubMed ID: 27154487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of the CXCR4 structure on docking-based virtual screening of HIV entry inhibitors.
    Planesas JM; Pérez-Nueno VI; Borrell JI; Teixidó J
    J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Sep; 38():123-36. PubMed ID: 23079643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enrichment of chemical libraries docked to protein conformational ensembles and application to aldehyde dehydrogenase 2.
    Wang B; Buchman CD; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2105-16. PubMed ID: 24856086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of Crystal Structures in Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Protein Kinase Inhibitors.
    Chen X; Liu H; Xie W; Yang Y; Wang Y; Fan Y; Hua Y; Zhu L; Zhao J; Lu T; Chen Y; Zhang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Dec; 59(12):5244-5262. PubMed ID: 31689093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Development of Target-Specific Pose Filter Ensembles To Boost Ligand Enrichment for Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Xia J; Hsieh JH; Hu H; Wu S; Wang XS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Jun; 57(6):1414-1425. PubMed ID: 28511009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structure-based computational approaches for small-molecule modulation of protein-protein interactions.
    Xu D; Wang B; Meroueh SO
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1278():77-92. PubMed ID: 25859944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
    Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Docking and Scoring with Target-Specific Pose Classifier Succeeds in Native-Like Pose Identification But Not Binding Affinity Prediction in the CSAR 2014 Benchmark Exercise.
    Politi R; Convertino M; Popov K; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1032-41. PubMed ID: 27050767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structure-based virtual screening of MT2 melatonin receptor: influence of template choice and structural refinement.
    Pala D; Beuming T; Sherman W; Lodola A; Rivara S; Mor M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):821-35. PubMed ID: 23541165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method.
    Kooistra AJ; Vischer HF; McNaught-Flores D; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28288. PubMed ID: 27339552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structure-based virtual screening approach for discovery of covalently bound ligands.
    Toledo Warshaviak D; Golan G; Borrelli KW; Zhu K; Kalid O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):1941-50. PubMed ID: 24932913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structure selection for protein kinase docking and virtual screening: homology models or crystal structures?
    Rockey WM; Elcock AH
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2006 Oct; 7(5):437-57. PubMed ID: 17073695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
    Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of small molecule binding. I. Accurate identification of strong inhibitors in virtual screening.
    Ding B; Wang J; Li N; Wang W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 23259763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving VEGFR-2 docking-based screening by pharmacophore postfiltering and similarity search postprocessing.
    Planesas JM; Claramunt RM; Teixidó J; Borrell JI; Pérez-Nueno VI
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Apr; 51(4):777-87. PubMed ID: 21417262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal strategies for virtual screening of induced-fit and flexible target in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge.
    Ye Z; Baumgartner MP; Wingert BM; Camacho CJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):695-706. PubMed ID: 27573981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.